Nucker101
Foundational Poster
- Apr 2, 2013
- 21,202
- 16,730
There has never been a rebuild. We don't need to start over again and rebuild, we need to start the rebuild.After 8 years, do we seriously need to start over completely again and rebuild?
f*** me
this bitch ass
They also talk constantly about not taking shortcuts, but then they seem to always take shortcuts in building their team. You can't take what they say seriously.For a team that always talk up the importance of character and leadership, this team is awfully lacking in character and leadership
For a team that always talk up the importance of character and leadership, this team is awfully lacking in character and leadership
Yeah but covidThis organization has become very toxic with Francesco’s shit smelling around the building, Bennings inability to build a winning team and Greens inability to be an NHL head coach.
Yeah but covid
this bitch ass
For a team that always talk up the importance of character and leadership, this team is awfully lacking in character and leadership
I agree that Milford was better than most. Phil was unfortunate and so was Poile, but the the drafting wasn't great and you can't get away from that. So many players missed. Sittler, Robinson etc. My big problem with Milford, who as you noted did make good trades, is the Derlago/Vaive for Williams/Butler trade. I don't mind Derlago, but Vaive was never given a chance in Vancouver. Williams provided the leadership they needed. But you should never trade a pure sniper unless you have no choice. Obviously the exchange of 5th rounders for Richard Brodeur was the second greatest trade in Canuck history even better than or equal to the trade that brought Courtnall and Ronning home. Quinn changed the culture of the team. Since then there have been down periods but never the malaise until now. It feels like 1986 again. Except they do have star players! They have to change the management and coaching to see who goes and who stays.I think Jake Milford passing away that early really hurt the franchise as well. Wasn't perfect (who is though?) but was the GM that got great line (Fraser & Smyl via the draft & Gradin via a trade). Left a big void for the Canucks that wasn't filled until Quinn came aboard.
My memory is a little hazy but I think he became GM not long after another decent GM of the Canucks (Phil Mahoney). I can't remember the circumstances regarding why Phil was replaced as he was the GM of the Canucks when they first had a .500 season (back when a .500 meant something). Think the WHA started up around this time, poaching players from the NHL (removing what little depth they might have had).
Nilsson was traded. And Markus Naslund was also traded. As was Peter Forsberg.Well.
Everyone except for Petey.
That doesn't mean they are NHL quality. Benning would be great as head Scout. Green will be backing the NHL after more time in the AHL. Unless the Aquamen Slumlords do nothing of course.Jim Benning and Travis Green are good hockey men
He can draft, and in the right situation I think Benning could be good. Right now he is living proof of the Peter Principal. The problem with the hard on of hate for Benning is it ignores what got him the job in the first place. Benning comes from a family of scouts. It's the only thing he does well. Just because he is incompetent in almost everything else doesn't take away from his talent in that area.Imagine still thinking Benning would be great at anything in a nearly billion dollar professional sports franchise.
It matters little if you can't do anything but draft and you have the position of GM though. Sam Presti drafted three NBA league MVPs (one or more were also rookie of the year) but never won anything.He can draft, and in the right situation I think Benning could be good. Right now he is living proof of the Peter Principal. The problem with the hard on of hate for Benning is it ignores what got him the job in the first place. Benning comes from a family of scouts. It's the only thing he does well. Just because he is incompetent in almost everything else doesn't take away from his talent in that area.
Which is why I said he is living proof of the Peter Principal. You have some delusion I am defending his record as GMIt matters little if you can't do anything but draft and you have the position of GM though. Sam Presti drafted three NBA league MVPs (one or more were also rookie of the year) but never won anything.
Doesn't help when John Weisbrod is your number two. But Benning put him in that post.
We're just wasting the prime years of Horvat, EP, Hughes, etc.,
He can't draft, he doesn't do it well and has no stand out talent in that area whatsoever over any other teams top actual scouts.He can draft, and in the right situation I think Benning could be good. Right now he is living proof of the Peter Principal. The problem with the hard on of hate for Benning is it ignores what got him the job in the first place. Benning comes from a family of scouts. It's the only thing he does well. Just because he is incompetent in almost everything else doesn't take away from his talent in that area.
He can draft, and in the right situation I think Benning could be good. Right now he is living proof of the Peter Principal. The problem with the hard on of hate for Benning is it ignores what got him the job in the first place. Benning comes from a family of scouts. It's the only thing he does well. Just because he is incompetent in almost everything else doesn't take away from his talent in that area.
Except for trading away 15 draft picks and a half dozen already drafted players for bubble gum to stop the leak in the dam?He can draft, and in the right situation I think Benning could be good. Right now he is living proof of the Peter Principal. The problem with the hard on of hate for Benning is it ignores what got him the job in the first place. Benning comes from a family of scouts. It's the only thing he does well. Just because he is incompetent in almost everything else doesn't take away from his talent in that area.
I won’t deny he’s done SOME good. But the bad has vastly out numbered the good and it’s not close imho.Except for trading away 15 draft picks and a half dozen already drafted players for bubble gum to stop the leak in the dam?
I can draft as good as him. Easily.He can draft, and in the right situation I think Benning could be good. Right now he is living proof of the Peter Principal. The problem with the hard on of hate for Benning is it ignores what got him the job in the first place. Benning comes from a family of scouts. It's the only thing he does well. Just because he is incompetent in almost everything else doesn't take away from his talent in that area.