Blue Liner
Registered User
If this is all true, why are so many people making the claim on this site and other places that Tampa's nice contracts are due to the tax benefit?
If the difference is that small, there should be more pushback on people saying the tax benefit is the reason for Tampa's good contracts. It just seems like the narrative has become accepted that it's all because of no state income tax.
Because they're incorrect. Many narratives are incorrect. Just because they exist and many people think they're true doesn't make them true. There are other hockey cities with the same benefit but no one mentions it about them. It could be a small factor but it's pretty far down the list of reasons in all reality. It's a very, very well run franchise that has a lot of players bought in among other factors already mentioned.