The "players today would be the best ever, because players today are better than ever" argument is lazy as shit.
It's a waste of everyone's time and it pollutes the very nature of the History subforum, where all posters ostensibly respect the rich tapestry of the game and the players who played it.
What's lazy is not looking at the absolute garbage that goalies back then let in. It’s there for anyone to see. There’s many goalies today who have surpassed Roy. Many.
Price is bigger, a better athlete, quicker, way way way more flexible, miles ahead technically and excels against vastly superior opponents who skate and shoot way better and are tactically several levels above players from the 80s and 90s. Price simply can get his bigger body in better position and get to more pucks, which takes him to another anticipatory level. Today everyone can shoot the puck, whereas you have 3-4 guys per team back then. You don't even have an argument if you say Roy's teams were not as good systems-wise in front of him because he played during the trap era. If you are having a literal all-time draft with players frozen at their peak and you take Roy over Price, your goaltending will be average at best. Even if you upgrade Roy to Price's standard technically, he's still smaller and slower. Is he any better than Halak? I'm not sure, but that's around where I would place Roy's ACTUAL value. If there was a goalie who could make the jump, for me it might be Hasek, but I still think Price can make any save Hasek can but more efficiently.
Same argument goes for McDavid, etc.
I understand the pain this causes, but this pain was allowed in by how the question was formulated.