Swedish Gretzky
Registered User
If Tavares signs, trade Nylander for D
not losing a quality player because of cap... moving your 6m F for a 6m D
Fatal error right there.
If Tavares signs, trade Nylander for D
not losing a quality player because of cap... moving your 6m F for a 6m D
How does trading 6 million dollars for 6 million dollars save you money?If Tavares signs, trade Nylander for D
not losing a quality player because of cap... moving your 6m F for a 6m D
BUMP
Thought it might be fun to BUMP this thread, given the current circumstances.
I was roasted by many for this thread over a year ago, and it is quite funny how some who slagged JT are those who are singing his praises now, and interesting how people's perceptions of Nylander have changed in the last while. I would hazard a guess a poll now on whether you would rather have JT + assets for Nylander or just Nylander I think would look a lot different now. It seems many have changed their tune.
Despite the thread topic I personally like Nylander and hope we keep him, and Dubas wants to keep him, but there is a possible likelihood Nylander doesn't want to take a discount and things change. Let's hope all works out and he is a Leaf for a very long time.
BUMP
Thought it might be fun to BUMP this thread, given the current circumstances.
I was roasted by many for this thread over a year ago, and it is quite funny how some who slagged JT are those who are singing his praises now, and interesting how people's perceptions of Nylander have changed in the last while. I would hazard a guess a poll now on whether you would rather have JT + assets for Nylander or just Nylander I think would look a lot different now. It seems many have changed their tune.
"Level off"? He went from 1.14 P1/60 to 1.76 P1/60.Things evolve.
When you posted this, we didn't know that Nylander would not improve over his 16/17 year giving credence to the idea he may level off to where he's already at ie a 60-70 point player.
Nor did we know that Willie was going to crap his pants at the thought of going into the corner with Chara in the playoffs.
Moreover, the entire premise of Nylander vs Tavares was faulty and a stretch to begin with. You can make the argument that every dollar the Leafs spend competes against Nylander's salary...not just the money we're spending on Tavares.
The idea that the Leafs would be offering more money to Willie if Tavares wasn't here is also presumptive and, likely, a faulty premise. They are offering him what they think he is worth.
Why do you presume they would be willing to pay over market for Willie if Tavares wasn't here?
Sorry dude big swing and miss here.