Dread Clawz
LAWSonic Boom
Oiler fan here.
If you retained a bit, and took Neal, and Koskinen, we would probably bite.
Bob would be even worse in Edmonton, he also has a nmc.
Oiler fan here.
If you retained a bit, and took Neal, and Koskinen, we would probably bite.
I couldn’t send it to my lady because that would be a lie.View attachment 396385
Oh Panthers PR
They got this right. My hearts stops everytime opponents take a shot at Bob
Its well known that Columbus was throwing like 8 or 9 M at him on a long term deal. Remember also, before we signed him there were rumors that the Isles were also gonna make an offer to him on July 1.
When you get caught bidding against yourself, it's when you're going to overpay... in any situation.Agree and this is what I was hoping for but Bob was always in Panthers rumors waaaay before we signed him.
I've always wondered, who the f@ck wanted to sign him besides us? Its never been clear that there was a bidding war with other teams for him or anything, in typical Panthers fashion they straight up threw the bank at him and lost.
I remember CBJ trying to keep him but the Isles thing not sure if it was ever real, who knows if that was all smoke. I cant stop thinking Tallon was bidding with himself all along.
That is the easy explanation but I find it hard to believe that there wasn’t a whole panel of people who nodded their heads and who didn’t do their due diligence. I don’t see Dale having that much power over everyone that they’d just take his word for it.When you get caught bidding against yourself, it's when you're going to overpay... in any situation.
Dale was bidding against himself and threw the chequebook at Bob. Should have been fired before making the signing,
That is the easy explanation but I find it hard to believe that there wasn’t a whole panel of people who nodded their heads and who didn’t do their due diligence. I don’t see Dale having that much power over everyone that they’d just take his word for it.
Dumb question, but hypothetically speaking, couldn’t they mutually agree to terminate his contract and then under the table just pay him all the remaining dollars that he’s worth? I know that wouldn’t be allowed obviously, but technically speaking how could the nhl ever know or prove it?
Yeah and I suppose that would be the most telling thing, but I was just thinking hypothetically if there’s no proof then how could they penalize the team. It’s a dumb question anyways lolThe nhl would never believe he voluntarily gave up 50 million dollars lol.
You never know if it's all smoke, although that doesn't really make sense in this case as the Isles are not really a rival of ours or anything. But I agree with you in a sense...in free agency, the most desperate team usually ends up winning...and overpaying.
Our only hope is LTIR. Nobody is going to trade for the worst starting goaltender in the entire league on the worst contract in the league. The franchise is f***ed, at least for a few years, until it's more feasible to buy this bozo out.
The frustrating part is that he is using poor technique a bit too often. He allowed Kane and Point to score in the top corner because he went too low and didn't stuff his shoulder/head into that corner, and he allowed a couple of breakaway goals by not using his stick to protect the five-hole. At his level, the basic techniques should be automatic. Hopefully it isn't too late to figure out ways to fix or compensate whatever is missing in his game.So the consensus looks like Bob is done.
I can’t totally disagree, however given that we’re stuck with him, putting on my optimist hat, I look at the last two games and say the first Tampa one was quite good, and the second Tampa one he truthfully was left to dry. I can only speak to goals 1-4 though, as I saw the rest of the team unravel.
Should Bob make a save on that breakaway? One could argue that - but why did Wennberg take that stupid ass shot? Should Bob have stopped the one with 15 sec to go in the second? Yeah maybe - but what the hell was Weegs and the rest of the team doing, trying their hardest to be as inept as possible?
I’m not arguing that Bob is worth $10M a year. I’m arguing that he’s worth $2.5M and could be more if the team didn’t have such crap games in front of him.
Depends on your definition of winning.
Playing devil's advocate here: Bob missed all of training camp with covid and definitely would have had to catch up on his timing and get back into game shape. I'm still holding out hope we haven't seen his best yet.
Dumb question, but hypothetically speaking, couldn’t they mutually agree to terminate his contract and then under the table just pay him all the remaining dollars that he’s worth? I know that wouldn’t be allowed obviously, but technically speaking how could the nhl ever know or prove it?
Thing is tho that you can find a lot of such excuses for a lot of goals subpar NHL goales let in.So the consensus looks like Bob is done.
I can’t totally disagree, however given that we’re stuck with him, putting on my optimist hat, I look at the last two games and say the first Tampa one was quite good, and the second Tampa one he truthfully was left to dry. I can only speak to goals 1-4 though, as I saw the rest of the team unravel.
Should Bob make a save on that breakaway? One could argue that - but why did Wennberg take that stupid ass shot? Should Bob have stopped the one with 15 sec to go in the second? Yeah maybe - but what the hell was Weegs and the rest of the team doing, trying their hardest to be as inept as possible?
I’m not arguing that Bob is worth $10M a year. I’m arguing that he’s worth $2.5M and could be more if the team didn’t have such crap games in front of him.
Could the Panthers actually give their $10M goalie a 30% share of the crease if Driedger keeps playing this well?
It's a PR nightmare, but it seems like Driedger has been the more reliable of the two.
Honestly many fans are upset that Q is giving it an almost 50/50 split, whilst riding the hot hand.Could the Panthers actually give their $10M goalie a 30% share of the crease if Driedger keeps playing this well?
It's a PR nightmare, but it seems like Driedger has been the more reliable of the two.
I wonder if SJ would entertain the idea of Karlsson for Bob. I haven't seen Karlsson play in a while, but I've heard he has been dreadful.Nobody will trade for him, that's for sure. The only way is to take another bad deal back but the problem is there isn't a team out there with an equally bad contract lol. You would probably have to take two bad deals back to make the cap work. I was looking at something like Vlasic + Jones @50% for Bob. That would be 10 million cap in & out for both teams although Jones' contract has only three years left.
There really is no way to get out of Bob's deal smelling like roses. It's going to be a scenery change type of deal where you hope guys will bounce back.