Hockey History

ArtPeur

Have a Snickers
Mar 30, 2010
13,605
11,389
He's a transcending skater without question but that's it. He's not head and shoulders better than everybody else in the league. He's not a Wayne, Mario, Bobby.... Of course that's just my opinion.

That's it?

He's constantly one of the top scorers every season. He was already dominating in his 2nd season. He's more than just skating and speed. It feels like you're comparing him to Byron

._.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs Icing and Wats

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
24,711
18,115
Quebec City, Canada




Hockey fans in 20 years.

- "Dmen were so slow in the 2020 no way he would be able to do this in 2040."
- "Yeah he would barely do 80 points in the current NHL".
- "Man those dmen could not even pivot both side let alone skate".
- "He really was not that great 2nd liners today are better hockey has evolved so much in the last 20 years".
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
24,711
18,115
Quebec City, Canada
Nobody in the NHL right now is a generational player. People need to stop using that term so liberally.

Ovechkin might very well be the best goal scorer of all time and this is coming from a mid life guy who watched hockey in the 80ies and who always defend the old players when people stupidly say Gretzky could barely do 100 points in today's NHL. If Ovechkin, Crosby and McJesus are not generational then nothing is.
 

sandviper

No Ragrets
Jan 26, 2016
13,440
24,440
Toronto
He's a transcending skater without question but that's it. He's not head and shoulders better than everybody else in the league. He's not a Wayne, Mario, Bobby.... Of course that's just my opinion.

Just gonna assume we’re close in age since you’ve mentioned 99, 66 and 4 (I assume). To me, McD is at least on Mario’s level, who I thought was better than Gretzky when looking at their peaks.

McDavid can do so much more than just skate; he can shoot, he can pass, his IQ and ability to process the game so fast is nuts. Package all of this in a 6’2 frame and plays center.

I mean, when he completely dummied Rielly, that was so much more than just skating. The fake out, recognizing the pivot from Rielly and turning on the jets at full speed is god level stuff.

I suppose many others are super elite as well; Drai and McK can make cases, as well as current godly players such as Crosby and Ovechkin.

It’s a different time now and super teams don’t really exist as we knew them in the 70s to 90s. McDavid isn’t perfect, but this guy has won games by himself. In today’s NHL, that puts him in a different category.

I wasa little young to recall much of Lafleur and Bossy at their peaks, but I’ve seen Gretzky and Lemieux... I would have no issue if anyone says McDavid in the same sentence.
 

Deebs

There's no easy way out
Feb 5, 2014
16,869
13,493
Just gonna assume we’re close in age since you’ve mentioned 99, 66 and 4 (I assume). To me, McD is at least on Mario’s level, who I thought was better than Gretzky when looking at their peaks.

McDavid can do so much more than just skate; he can shoot, he can pass, his IQ and ability to process the game so fast is nuts. Package all of this in a 6’2 frame and plays center.

I mean, when he completely dummied Rielly, that was so much more than just skating. The fake out, recognizing the pivot from Rielly and turning on the jets at full speed is god level stuff.

I suppose many others are super elite as well; Drai and McK can make cases, as well as current godly players such as Crosby and Ovechkin.

It’s a different time now and super teams don’t really exist as we knew them in the 70s to 90s. McDavid isn’t perfect, but this guy has won games by himself. In today’s NHL, that puts him in a different category.

I wasa little young to recall much of Lafleur and Bossy at their peaks, but I’ve seen Gretzky and Lemieux... I would have no issue if anyone says McDavid in the same sentence.
I disagree with most of what you say here but it's all good, differences of opinions make for good conversations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gyfu

redgrant

Registered User
Nov 2, 2013
6,306
3,688
Uh, McDavid?

Would put the generational players as gretzky Lemieux.

Next Gen Lidstrom alone.

Crosby Ovechkin most recently.

McDavid in a class of his own. Lol no Matthews is not generational. You need to be in the conversation for the hart Ross if you're "generational" and a centre on your team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pickles and puckie

Legend123

Registered User
Jul 3, 2016
9,803
4,917
Would put the generational players as gretzky Lemieux.

Next Gen Lidstrom alone.

Crosby Ovechkin most recently.

McDavid in a class of his own. Lol no Matthews is not generational. You need to be in the conversation for the hart Ross if you're "generational" and a centre on your team.
what? where did u pop up from?
 

BehindTheTimes

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
7,109
9,400
Just gonna assume we’re close in age since you’ve mentioned 99, 66 and 4 (I assume). To me, McD is at least on Mario’s level, who I thought was better than Gretzky when looking at their peaks.

McDavid can do so much more than just skate; he can shoot, he can pass, his IQ and ability to process the game so fast is nuts. Package all of this in a 6’2 frame and plays center.

I mean, when he completely dummied Rielly, that was so much more than just skating. The fake out, recognizing the pivot from Rielly and turning on the jets at full speed is god level stuff.

I suppose many others are super elite as well; Drai and McK can make cases, as well as current godly players such as Crosby and Ovechkin.

It’s a different time now and super teams don’t really exist as we knew them in the 70s to 90s. McDavid isn’t perfect, but this guy has won games by himself. In today’s NHL, that puts him in a different category.

I wasa little young to recall much of Lafleur and Bossy at their peaks, but I’ve seen Gretzky and Lemieux... I would have no issue if anyone says McDavid in the same sentence.
Doesn’t come close to Mario/Wayne in offensive ability. Not in the same stratosphere imo.
 

Habs

We should have drafted Michkov
Feb 28, 2002
21,272
14,824
Would put the generational players as gretzky Lemieux.

Next Gen Lidstrom alone.

Crosby Ovechkin most recently.

McDavid in a class of his own. Lol no Matthews is not generational. You need to be in the conversation for the hart Ross if you're "generational" and a centre on your team.

I hate everything about the Leafs, but Matthews may be generational
Doesn’t come close to Mario/Wayne in offensive ability. Not in the same stratosphere imo.

Take those 90's and 80's stats with a grain of salt, Probert was potting 20 back in the day. Goalies were awful, nobody backchecked. If McJesus, Tavares, Stamkos etc played back in the day they would have destroyed with the skill level they have right now. I've been watching since the 70's and I can't think of but 2 players that skate like any of these kids, or who have the shot of Ovechkin.. that one timer. Try and find deadly one timers bakc in teh day, they don't exist. Sure wayne and mario were exceptional, but he could not skate anywhere like the kids today.

Shit, players smoked between periods still in the late 80's.
 

BehindTheTimes

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
7,109
9,400
I hate everything about the Leafs, but Matthews may be generational


Take those 90's and 80's stats with a grain of salt, Probert was potting 20 back in the day. Goalies were awful, nobody backchecked. If McJesus, Tavares, Stamkos etc played back in the day they would have destroyed with the skill level they have right now. I've been watching since the 70's and I can't think of but 2 players that skate like any of these kids, or who have the shot of Ovechkin.. that one timer. Try and find deadly one timers bakc in teh day, they don't exist. Sure wayne and mario were exceptional, but he could not skate anywhere like the kids today.

Shit, players smoked between periods still in the late 80's.
Mario and Wayne would be winning scoring races by 30-40 points every year on repeat. It’s not close.
 

River Meadow

Registered User
Mar 29, 2016
6,323
8,249
Just gonna assume we’re close in age since you’ve mentioned 99, 66 and 4 (I assume). To me, McD is at least on Mario’s level, who I thought was better than Gretzky when looking at their peaks.

McDavid can do so much more than just skate; he can shoot, he can pass, his IQ and ability to process the game so fast is nuts. Package all of this in a 6’2 frame and plays center.

I mean, when he completely dummied Rielly, that was so much more than just skating. The fake out, recognizing the pivot from Rielly and turning on the jets at full speed is god level stuff.

I suppose many others are super elite as well; Drai and McK can make cases, as well as current godly players such as Crosby and Ovechkin.

It’s a different time now and super teams don’t really exist as we knew them in the 70s to 90s. McDavid isn’t perfect, but this guy has won games by himself. In today’s NHL, that puts him in a different category.

I wasa little young to recall much of Lafleur and Bossy at their peaks, but I’ve seen Gretzky and Lemieux... I would have no issue if anyone says McDavid in the same sentence.

IMO,

McDavid is great but he is NOT on Lemieux's nor Gretzky's level.

Would you honestly say this if McDavid was Russian or any other nationality than Canadian?

I don't think McDavid is even as good as prime Jagr.
 

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,056
5,547
Take those 90's and 80's stats with a grain of salt, Probert was potting 20 back in the day. Goalies were awful, nobody backchecked. If McJesus, Tavares, Stamkos etc played back in the day they would have destroyed with the skill level they have right now. I've been watching since the 70's and I can't think of but 2 players that skate like any of these kids, or who have the shot of Ovechkin.. that one timer. Try and find deadly one timers bakc in teh day, they don't exist. Sure wayne and mario were exceptional, but he could not skate anywhere like the kids today.

Shit, players smoked between periods still in the late 80's.

On the flip side those guys had wood sticks instead of the carbon fibre ones that today's players have so is it fair to compare their shots like that?
 

River Meadow

Registered User
Mar 29, 2016
6,323
8,249
Especially Mario, the man has the best tools ever, complete machine of a man until he broke down. He was like a Ferrari.

Yep. Even when he broke down.... playing with basically a broken back, older... STILL dominates.

There's way more to this than just skating really really fast, which is McDavid's bread and butter.

The amount of hockey sense and hockey IQ, was literally like 200 IQ.
 

Habs

We should have drafted Michkov
Feb 28, 2002
21,272
14,824
On the flip side those guys had wood sticks instead of the carbon fibre ones that today's players have so is it fair to compare their shots like that?

Yeah, for sure, but the goalies were so small back then, and generally awful. So many bad players had a ton of points in the late 80's and 90's, I mean Jason Allison could hardly skate and he was an allstar. I really don't think we can appreciate how bad the general player was bad in the day, because the game was so different. Tons of untalented goons, goalies that were 5'9 and covered 1/4 of the net, zero backchecking. BTW this was my favorite time to be a fan, but hockey was a different game 25 years ago. Watch an hour of 99's highlights, they are hilarious how bad the defense and goaltending were. He rarely would snipe a one-timer, to say he was protected is an understatement. If he was treated like Crosby out there, with the headshots and hits, he wouldn't be half the player he was.

I have half a dozen good friends who played in the NHL, they are the first to say the kids today are 2x the players from their glory days in the 90's. Of course the legends would still be amazing players in today's game, but no way 99 is potting 70 goals, he could never shoot the puck like Ovechkin, not even close.
 

supsens

Registered User
Oct 6, 2013
6,577
2,000
Yeah, for sure, but the goalies were so small back then, and generally awful. So many bad players had a ton of points in the late 80's and 90's, I mean Jason Allison could hardly skate and he was an allstar. I really don't think we can appreciate how bad the general player was bad in the day, because the game was so different. Tons of untalented goons, goalies that were 5'9 and covered 1/4 of the net, zero backchecking. BTW this was my favorite time to be a fan, but hockey was a different game 25 years ago. Watch an hour of 99's highlights, they are hilarious how bad the defense and goaltending were. He rarely would snipe a one-timer, to say he was protected is an understatement. If he was treated like Crosby out there, with the headshots and hits, he wouldn't be half the player he was.

I have half a dozen good friends who played in the NHL, they are the first to say the kids today are 2x the players from their glory days in the 90's. Of course the legends would still be amazing players in today's game, but no way 99 is potting 70 goals, he could never shoot the puck like Ovechkin, not even close.

A super old super slow Jagr had zero problems playing in this era, a young jagr would destroy these guys and he was not even close to 66 and 99.
Watch goal highlights from any era and the goalies and D look bad, they got beat..
 

Riggins

Registered User
Jul 12, 2002
7,823
4,599
Vancouver, BC
Yep. Even when he broke down.... playing with basically a broken back, older... STILL dominates.

There's way more to this than just skating really really fast, which is McDavid's bread and butter.

The amount of hockey sense and hockey IQ, was literally like 200 IQ.

Mario came back at 35 years old after 3 years off and was the best player in the world still that season. Freakin beast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: River Meadow

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
75,269
45,224
Mario definitely had the most raw talent of any player in history, but ppl tend to undersell Wayne’s talent imo.
I think Mario Lemieux is the greatest player of all time.

Wayne Gretzky had the greatest career. That is indisputable. But if I had to choose one for a seven game series assuming they're both at 100% and healthy in their prime - I'd take Lemieux.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad