Because the thing with Lemieux was during pregame warmups when the other team was present, and he was openly taunting them, and not only that, they told him not to shoot it in the net or they would have issues.
Come on, nobody's dense enough to think these two situations are anywhere close to being the same thing. Stop insulting people's intelligence with these nonsense false equivalencies. If this is the best argument you have it's an embarrassingly bad one.
no the thing with lemiex was not, they tried it when the flyers were present, then left the ice ( with the flyers) and then came back with no flyers on the ice and tried it again.
so a supersticious putting the puck in the next WHEN THE OTHER TEAM IS NOT THERE is "tauntting" but doing " i'm a little teapot" after a game is just good clean fun "for the fans"
I've seen pre game brawls happen when a guy puts one skate over center in the pregame. so no, chumley, you don't get to unilaterally define what a team can and cannot take offense to.
You’re correct, their opponents are never present. It’s not at all meant to mock the other team. It’s a simple “thank you” to the fans and a way to engage with them. Anyone suggesting otherwise is either being willfully ignorant or they’re just not very bright.
they aree not the same lets see
1) one team had left the ice
2) a player from the home team did something on the ice to scratch a supersticious itch
3) two players who were in the dressing room came back onto the ice ( there were no refs_
4) ed hospodar clocked lemieux ( chico kind of just stood around)
5) players from both teams, in various states of undress ( there had already left the ice and were in the dressing room) came back on the ice to scrap.
6) a pier 6 brawl ensued
yeah you are right, those two incidents are 100% different because one happened before the game and one happened after
100% different.