You have to commend the head coach for playing a rookie on his top line and first PP for half the season, this has certainly helped Strome, but I wonder if he hasn't put all his eggs in one basket and somewhat neglected some of the other players?? You're not gonna get far moving forward only developing one player each year.
Yes and no, I guess it depends on your coaching style.
In my eyes, the CHL is in the middle ground of between the cut-throat ice performance matters, we play this game to win, we pay you to do your job and do it well and if you don't we'll replace you mentality pro hockey has and the learn the skills, learn the life lessons, be athletic mentality, figure out your place in the team of youth hockey. In my eyes, being eased into that understanding at the time is important. The decision to jump into or back out of a potential pro-hockey career for a player is one of the most important decisions a player can make and they need to understand this is how it is, it only gets harder from here.
Thus, it's hard to wholly find fault with a coach giving players who perform better more ice time, like he clearly has with Strome and weaker players less. Do I think Strome is getting too much attention comparatively? No. Other players have developed (or perhaps had their development was stunted by the previous staff) as I've seen much improvement on the part of Luff, Cramarossa and Hicks. I mean, Hicks and Luff were both 7th round picks and now they are top line starters. Now granted Hicks kind of fell into it with Graham's trade, but I'd say for his second season in the league, he's doing well.
The issue I have with Burnett is his play calling and systems I don't like and have repeatability failed for us, but he seems to keep running them to the point of where they may become bad habits later on in a player's career. He frequently has a man up needlessly, he frequently has players camping on the blue line (Fox was the odd man this game), too often offence seems to stop when we are up by two in the 3rd, we seldom seem to be able to setup screens on the power play and while this last game didn't show it, slot aversion has been an ongoing problem this entire year, typically either getting their too late or not getting there to make a play on a rebound.
However as far as developing and improving players, I only have a few complaints. Specifically there's a lot of lazy passing going on the last three weeks in our end, a lot of just plain execution failures near the goal, but I blame that partly on the aforementioned slot aversion.