badi
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2008
- 858
- 586
Peca should be in the ECHL but with Habs he will be second line center
Great for the Tank
Great for the Tank
Peca should be in the ECHL but with Habs he will be second line center
Great for the Tank
Peca should be in the ECHL but with Habs he will be second line center
Great for the Tank
In addition those are some of our 'best' players. Not like that matters in the playoffs when hockey tightens up and the refs put the whistles away.5 of 12 forwards & Drouin, Plekanec & Lehkonen aren't exactly big or play big either.
We don't exactly have a tough D.
Small team. We better be fast.
I've been following hockey for over 30 years and it's the first time i hear about this rule. It just show you how unusual the situation is. Those type of guys never get multiple years one way NHL contract over the league's minimum. Pretty much never happen (yeah there's surely exceptions like for all things). If you are over 25 and have less than 80 games played you'll get a two way contract at best most of the time.
Got a pedigree. I can see MB trading Ottawa Patches and two 2nds for TkuchuckYou know you are a ****ty and not dangerous team when one of our biggest rival like Tampa Bay are trying to reassure us as to how good Matthew freakin Peca is…..
Peca should be in the ECHL but with Habs he will be second line center
Great for the Tank
Got a pedigree. I can see MB trading Ottawa Patches and two 2nds for Tkuchuck
Honesty I am getting real tired of this on every freaking trade this GM makes. Then in 6 months : "It doesn't matter it didn't cost us anything" Meanwhile our prospect stagnate we lose another year of prime time for our our best players and we sink a little further in the standings while this roster spots does nothing to improve the team. Outside of Byron and Petry last season we have nothing to show for in 6 years...oh yeah we have DSP and Eller winning a cup because they sucked to much on the habs.It's an interesting signing to say the least. I know many hate that move, but we're not losing anything here. It's low risk/high reward. The kid might surprise us or might not bring anything of worth. It's a bit concerning that we are getting smaller everyday but if he has the skills to play and contribute I am for it. If not, he will be a threat in Laval.
Will be watching closely,
Honesty I am getting real tired of this on every freaking trade this GM makes. Then in 6 months : "It doesn't matter it didn't cost us anything" Meanwhile our prospect stagnate we lose another year of prime time for our our best players and we sink a little further in the standings while this roster spots does nothing to improve the team. Outside of Byron and Petry last season we have nothing to show for in 6 years...oh yeah we have DSP and Eller winning a cup because they sucked to much on the habs.
He was 0.5ppg last season in the NHL as a 4th liner.
That is how we know we are screwed next season. Weber is also out to start the season. Another tanky start so we will be 8 balled anyway.You can repeat this 100 times and posters will still ignore it.
I could put up those stats on that Tampa team.
I could put up those stats on that Tampa team.
You, like the rest of us here struggle to get out of bed in the morning.
Honesty I am getting real tired of this on every freaking trade this GM makes. Then in 6 months : "It doesn't matter it didn't cost us anything" Meanwhile our prospect stagnate we lose another year of prime time for our our best players and we sink a little further in the standings while this roster spots does nothing to improve the team. Outside of Byron and Petry last season we have nothing to show for in 6 years...oh yeah we have DSP and Eller winning a cup because they sucked to much on the habs.
After bad team scorers, we have good team scorers. Why can't we have middle of the pack team scorers???I could put up those stats on that Tampa team.
I have no doubt Peca can do 40 points if you give him lot of TOI in a top 6. We have seen a couple of average bottom 6 guys in the past 25 years doing 40 points here while getting undeserved TOI (Petrov, Zholtok, Bulis, ...). The real question is can Peca be better than the options we already have (Danault, Lehkonen, Hudon, Shaw, Byron and Armia). I firmly believe the answer to that question is no.
If the plan is to fill a jersey with him after trading Patch and Byron this season and then flip him for a pick at the 2020 deadline then fair. But i'm far from sure this is MB's plan. Time will tell.
That is the ONLY moves he makes. They are the very reason he is named bargainbin. All we do is dumpster dive trying to find a rose in a bucket of poop. With ALL the moves we have made like this we have Byron and a list of almost 100 fails. 1% success doesn't strike me as a good strategy. But hey whatever floats your boat. Its not like I expect the habs to win a cup in the next 12 years anyway.Those types of moves don't prevent GMs from actually adding to the core of their team. They also aren't going to block actual quality prospects in the system.
Just because Bergevin is a bad GM, doesn't mean these types of trades aren't smart. Literally every team makes those types of moves.
Peca is a center. Not really sure why you're comparing him to wingers.
I like this post.I'm a reliable 2 way C in our oldtimers league, how dare you suggest otherwise.
That is the ONLY moves he makes. They are the very reason he is named bargainbin. All we do is dumpster dive trying to find a rose in a bucket of poop. With ALL the moves we have made like this we have Byron and a list of almost 100 fails. 1% success doesn't strike me as a good strategy. But hey whatever floats your boat. Its not like I expect the habs to win a cup in the next 12 years anyway.
We can keep picking up garbage while trading good players for weaker ones and many on here will say "look it doesn't hurt us and other GMs do these kind of moves" . But other GMs are actually making their top lines better, not their 4th line or AHL club-the habs strategy that doesn't work!