I'd do 5M for 2 years, 3 years is scary. If term is a deal breaker for Gardiner i'd do 4.5M for 3 years.
Its better than what we have because our Bergevin did not think of a plan about markov leaving retiring. Markov was already old enough to think about the future when bergevin joined habs.I have watched him...his gaffs are monumental, to say the least... On the other him, he may be 'trash' but that 'trash' is still better than what we have...
Yeah, our LD is...well, to put it politely, leaves a lot to be desired.
If his back is an issue.. at all.. you LTIR him and it's a non-factor.
Gardiner should have been signed long before Chiarot.. well, Chiarot should have never been signed.
Gardiner-Weber
Mete-Petry
Kulak-Not Chiarot
If his back is an issue.. at all.. you LTIR him and it's a non-factor.
He's not an offensive Dman
He never has been
No….put up 44 points in 50 games in his last season in the OHL
I'm not calling a defensive D
He is not terrible in his zone. It's just that when he makes a mistake, it is generally more "memorable" and therefore it gives people who judge player by "highly memorable events", rather than the grand scheme of things, this impression.Ex Leaf, no thanks. Besides, he is terrible in his zone.
He is not terrible in his zone. It's just that when he makes a mistake, it is generally more "memorable" and therefore it gives people who judge player by "highly memorable events", rather than the grand scheme of things, this impression.
He's not "great", but he's slightly above average. The thing is, when he's on the ice, opponents get lesser scoring opportinities, lesser shots, etc. than when he's not. Despite having to play with an actual anchor in Zaitsev, who is pretty much a negative in every aspect of the game. Overall, he has a positive defensive impact. Like I said, it's just a matter of people focusing on the "memorable".No, i am pretty sure he is horrible in his zone.
Bergevin already wasted 3.5m for 3 years to a 5th d-man in Chiarot. Signing Kulak Chiarot and Gardiner would not make any sense for the incoming defs in the system.
Josh Gorges had 59 points in his D+1 year in the WHL, is he an offensive D too?
Game is not all offensive D and stay-at-home D. His strenght is the defensive side of things, but he's also good at passing.
What were his PP stats? I could see mgmt thinking he'd help the power play given his offensive reputation.
What were his PP stats? I could see mgmt thinking he'd help the power play given his offensive reputation.
No, i am pretty sure he is horrible in his zone.
44pts in 50 games in his D+1 season?No….put up 44 points in 50 games in his last season in the OHL
I'm not calling a defensive D
If his back is an issue.. at all.. you LTIR him and it's a non-factor.
Gardiner should have been signed long before Chiarot.. well, Chiarot should have never been signed.
Gardiner-Weber
Mete-Petry
Kulak-Not Chiarot