Simonster
Registered User
- Jul 23, 2013
- 14
- 0
I clearly said black on white if you had taken the time to scroll down the page under what you had initially quoted, that Leksand did not need to surrender their rights on the player and adhere to Montreal's wishes. I'm "trying to make of (your) statement" that you shouldn't come on another board and claim posts are "ignorant" instead of "disagreeing" with a post without taking time to figure out the context.
I did scroll and I did read. It sure seemed to me that you acknowledged the fact that 'Montreal doesn't have the power' but still held the opinion that they should be the ones to decide. But hey, maybe I misunderstood a bit and you only referred to Montreal being the only ones with any interest in his development (which I still don't quite agree with, but fair enough). My apologies if this is the case, it happens all to easily when communicating like this. It doesn't change much of what I've written today though.