Do the Bruins have a fighting major yet this season?
I don't think so.
it's almost as if fighting has been banned in the garden. Guess there is no point in ever having great fight debate thread. There are no great fights happening
Banned in the Garden?
So what do you suggest they should do? I'd like them to target Laval's best players and let them know if this idiot is going to run around and cheap shot guys - they better be ready.
it was hyperbole, as in they banned fighting in TD Garden. Anyway they don't have to fight or play that physical, they just aren't built for it. They are a non physical skill team that can put up goals but gets roughed up vs the bigger teams
What bigger team has "roughed them up" so far this season?
lets not try to pretend the bruins are one of the bigger physical teams in the league with all sort of defections. waste of time
I think this is the latest in franchise history where the Bruins have no fighting majors.
it was hyperbole, as in they banned fighting in TD Garden. Anyway they don't have to fight or play that physical, they just aren't built for it. They are a non physical skill team that can put up goals but gets roughed up vs the bigger teams
It's basically the same team from last year, where the Bruins lead the league in fights.
Calgary is tied for 8th in fights this year... with 2. It's just something teams don't do much of anymore. Fighting is in decline and has been for the past decade.
Tampa and Washington each have 4 and 3. Some teams are fighting, some are not. Its still allowed.
love myself a good scrap and tough players but have also come to redefine my attitude on fighting as the game has progressed well past fighting playing much of a factor these days. The majority of these kids play in leagues where there`s either 0 fighting or the league has worked hard to put the clamps on a scrap happening every 5 minutes and by the time they arrive in the NHL, most of these kids have never dropped the mitts and are horrific at it.
Of TB's 4 fights, 2 happened vs. Colorado (also with 4 fights) in the same game (Calvert was in both). The other 2 happened in the same game vs. Ottawa. So even TB have only had fights in 25% of their games. League wide it's only roughly 15% of games. 1/3 of the league hasn't had a fight yet.
Its down but there is still fighting happening where fans of old time hockey can catch the action. I don't see them banning it.
It might just happen on it's own...
Its down but there is still fighting happening where fans of old time hockey can catch the action. I don't see them banning it.
Tampa and Washington each have 4 and 3. Some teams are fighting, some are not. Its still allowed.
Still allowed, still early in the season. The last thing we should worry about is the number of team fights after 8 games - it's bound to happen eventually.
Again, it's basically the same team returning from last year that lead the league in fighting. We'll see it again when it presents itself.
If your goal is to watch a hockey game just to see a fight break out, why not watch MMA or boxing instead? Seems like that would cater directly to what you're complaining about missing in hockey, no?
In reality, the league is slowly legislating fighting out of the game. Guys coming in have to wear half shields automatically and it's only a matter of time before they move to full shields as well. Fighting is taking a back seat to actual ability, and I'm fine with it.
I've always enjoyed a good hockey fight, but the last 20 years were really more about staged goon fights than anything resulting from genuine heat during the game, and those fights were terrible. If a fight breaks out over something real that's related to the game, I'm all in. But if you're talking about stiff vs stiff because that's their only job? Nah. I'll pass on that all day long.