I'm not missing any point. Again, he's played nearly as many senior minutes as Sancho, he's played around 300 more minutes than Camavinga (this was an edit, was only looking at Camavinga's league minutes) and almost 600 more minutes than Haaland.
Actually, it's not that close. Davies has 2808 minutes, and Sancho has 3141. But again, I never said its specifically the minutes. It's all the context surrounding those minutes, which you are missing. Sancho has been a star, option #1 for his team since game 1. For two months to start the season Davies was a bench player. That clearly matters.
And I never said Camavinga should win. Take that up with Evilo, if you want. I mentioned him among players that won't realistically contend for the award, but like Davies, had a good season and could win it in a future season.
Haaland will have his minutes work against him, so don't worry about that one. He's a striker that has 22 goals in 21 games between the UCL, Bundesliga and German Cup. Thats an incredible rate for a player of any age and is usually the kind of rate you'd be talking about for the Ballon d'or, but thats only 1391 minutes. It's about half of the season Sancho's played at the top level, and Sancho's been as productive. If he had a full season, it might be close, and Haaland is probably the closest player there is to Sancho this season, but he also does not match up for this award.
He's started in the CL and just been named Bayern's player of the month (when was the last time a teenager won this award anyway?) including a match where he outplayed Haaland head to head, and did the same to Sancho earlier in the season. You can't just say threre's 'too many good players' for an LB when he's outperformed them, at 19, on one of the best teams on the planet.
This is exactly what I mean when I say you are missing the point. You are trying to read me a summary of his season. It's good, maybe very good. It's still not going to be good enough to realistically contend for this award. The same can be said about nearly 20 other players, which I named.
I'm not sure what your point is there. Have any of those been arguably one of the top 2 players for Bayern Munich on the way to a title, possibly a CL, and outperformed supposed favourites for the golden boy award in head to head match-ups and in the same league while also putting in dominating performances in the CL? It's like you're completely trying to play off what Davies has shown, done on the pitch and how he's been received and scoffing at him just being some random LB who wasn't initially a starter (but then earned his place, and has hit the ground running ever since...)
What about his pedigree doesn't make him worthy of the award?
You are right. None of them have played for Bayern Munich, but the award isn't about awarding the best young player at Bayern Munich. There are a lot of good players up for the award. You have to play a world class season. Not starting for the first two months of a season is probably enough to say a player won't contend to win the award, and then being a LB makes things doubly harder. Good season. Shouldn't contend for the award.
And one thing to keep in mind is that it was supposedly used against Sancho last season that he wasn't a starter at the beginning of the season, and he wasn't option #1 until the end of the season. He still managed 13G+19A last season, and he still didn't win.