Proposal: Gaudreau (CGY) for Brady Tkachuk (OTT)

[ViktorBaeArvidsson]

Oh boy... lol. Not even close in value.

 

[Flamesfan62]

Seriously? That’d be awful for Calgary.

 

[Flamesfan62]

It's an overpayment... I am aware. How else do you move the needle to make it happen though?

Simple. You don’t.

 

[Nac Mac Feegle]

This thread needs a lock.

Proposal is totally unrealistic.

 

[FerrisRox]

Obviously everyone and their brother (lousy pun) know that the brothers will want to play together eventually.

Where are you getting that from?

I think it is an interesting trade that could give Ottawa a star player to build around and sell to their fans. Johnny Hockey is an offensive dynamo, but in the long run maybe uniting the Tkachuk brothers would pay off for Calgary considering the age of their core. At the moment Calgary gives up more value imo, but it is a Hockey trade that could work out for both teams.

More value?

You have to be kidding. This is hilariously lop-sided in the Senators favour. This a joke.

 

[FerrisRox]

Obviously everyone and their brother (lousy pun) know that the brothers will want to play together eventually.

Where are you getting that from?

I think it is an interesting trade that could give Ottawa a star player to build around and sell to their fans. Johnny Hockey is an offensive dynamo, but in the long run maybe uniting the Tkachuk brothers would pay off for Calgary considering the age of their core. At the moment Calgary gives up more value imo, but it is a Hockey trade that could work out for both teams.

More value?

You have to be kidding. This is hilariously lop-sided in the Senators favour. This a joke.

 

[Howie Hodge]

One of two possibilities here.

1) OP is trolling.

3) OP just started following hockey or is 11 years old.

I'll go with trolling for 100 please Alex...

 

[HugginThePost]

Oh lawd!! No, just no!

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see the Chukies united, but at the expense of Johnny?

Not in a million years.

 

[Henkka]

Both Tkachuks is possible to see in Ottawa.

Matt Tkachuk for Mark Stone at the deadline, and there you go.

 

[Patagonia]

This is so terrible for CGY, this deserves an infraction for the terrible proposal. I even hate Gaudreau and this is so bad.

 

[Baxterman]

One of two possibilities here.

1) OP is trolling.

3) OP just started following hockey or is 11 years old.

I'll go with trolling for 100 please Alex...

A lot of Flames fans became obsessed with Brady because of the last name. He was already overrated by most because of his last name but among many Flames fans this overrating came to an insane level because of the fact that we have Matthew and he is a fan favorite.

So I think it is likely more that he has overrated him because of watching Matthew and now thinks that Brady, based on his last name.

 

[Lunatik]

What the heck is this crap?

Zero chance the Flames consider this.

 

[82Ninety42011]

Somebody was seriously bored or trolling for this proposal.

 

[Seachd]

Yeah I’ll just wait till Brady signs with Calgary when he plays out the next three years in college.

Yeah, because 4th overall picks always wait until they’re done college to sign...

As for the proposal, it sucks out loud for the Flames.

 

[FingerLickinGood]

Any way you spin this...this is probably the worst trade proposal I have seen on here. Epic fail

 

[FingerLickinGood]

Yeah, because 4th overall picks always wait until they’re done college to sign...

As for the proposal, it sucks out loud for the Flames.

If you would have done any research on this you would have known that it doesn't sound like Brady Tkachuk will sign in Ottawa. Therefore, after the deadline to sign the player is reached he becomes a free agent.

 

[Deen]

Seems like a resounding no to the idea. Can a mod lock this up?

 

[DFF]

Both Tkachuks is possible to see in Ottawa.

Matt Tkachuk for Mark Stone at the deadline, and there you go.

So the Flames trade one of their best young players for a month of Mark Stone?

How about Michael Stone for Brady Tkachuk so you can have both Stone? That makes just as much sense.

 

[DFF]

Both Tkachuks is possible to see in Ottawa.

Matt Tkachuk for Mark Stone at the deadline, and there you go.

So the Flames trade one of their best young players for a month of Mark Stone?

How about Michael Stones for Brady Tkachuk? That makes just as much sense.

 

[Henkka]

So the Flames trade one of their best young players for a month of Mark Stone?

How about Michael Stones for Brady Tkachuk? That makes just as much sense.

Never heard about contract extension?

 

[Seachd]

If you would have done any research on this you would have known that it doesn't sound like Brady Tkachuk will sign in Ottawa. Therefore, after the deadline to sign the player is reached he becomes a free agent.

1) Do you know when that date is? It’s August 15, 2021.

2) I’d love to see the “research” you have that shows he won’t sign by that date.

3) I’d also love to hear about all the past examples of top-4 picks that postponed professional hockey for 3 years so they could become a free agent. I’ll wait.

 

[Roof Daddy]

So the Flames trade one of their best young players for a month of Mark Stone?

How about Michael Stones for Brady Tkachuk? That makes just as much sense.

Contract status aside (still think Flames should have pursued this trade before Sens gave him 1 yr deal), Mark Stone is considerably better than Matt Tkachuk. And the Flames actually need a 1RW (Neal more of a 2RW at this stage).

Brady for Michael? That's atrocious.

 

[DFF]

Never heard about contract extension?

yes, why dont you extend him first

 

[DFF]

Never heard about contract extension?

yes, why dont you extend him first

 

[DFF]

Contract status aside (still think Flames should have pursued this trade before Sens gave him 1 yr deal), Mark Stone is considerably better than Matt Tkachuk. And the Flames actually need a 1RW (Neal more of a 2RW at this stage).

Brady for Michael? That's atrocious.

Yes, if everything else is equal, I would take Stone but they are not so I would keep the younger and probably cheaper option with control

 

[Sureves]

This thread needs a lock.

Proposal is totally unrealistic.

Ya I can’t believe people are even warranting this with a response to be honest.

Never in a million years should Calgary even consider this.

 

[Roof Daddy]

Yes, if everything else is equal, I would take Stone but they are not so I would keep the younger and probably cheaper option with control

I can't argue with that stance and realize Tkachuk is already a fan fave, but Stone would make GODreau and Monehan better. Dude is a 2 way/possession beast. Pay more in salary, but get more at the same time.

 

[Baxterman]

Contract status aside (still think Flames should have pursued this trade before Sens gave him 1 yr deal), Mark Stone is considerably better than Matt Tkachuk. And the Flames actually need a 1RW (Neal more of a 2RW at this stage).

Brady for Michael? That's atrocious.

What?

Stone on a reasonable deal for Tkachuk USA terrible deal, Stone for Tkachuk prior to him signing would have been a fireable offense.

 

[Baxterman]

Contract status aside (still think Flames should have pursued this trade before Sens gave him 1 yr deal), Mark Stone is considerably better than Matt Tkachuk. And the Flames actually need a 1RW (Neal more of a 2RW at this stage).

Brady for Michael? That's atrocious.

What?

Stone on a reasonable deal for Tkachuk is a terrible deal, Stone for Tkachuk prior to him signing would have been a fireable offense.