Hopefully if we get outplayed tonight that we get 6 power plays like Pitt got tuesday
Dream on
Hopefully if we get outplayed tonight that we get 6 power plays like Pitt got tuesday
I think you could put a 4 x 4 post with Marchy and Bergy and get good stats.The line of Marchand - Bergeron - Smith could be an interesting one tonight. This was last game vs PIT when they played about 4 minutes together:
In the 4:22 they played together, they outshot PIT 5-1 and out chanced them 3-1.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
CF% SF% xGF xGA xGF% SCF% HDCF% 85.71 83.33 0.26 0.08 75.33 75.00 100.00
Literally every other player is dealing with that too. Not sure why people think that is an excuse to be shitty.
I think you could put a 4 x 4 post with Marchy and Bergy and get good stats.
Even better if its pressure treated.
I think you could put a 4 x 4 post with Marchy and Bergy and get good stats.
Even better if its pressure treated.
yes I thought that exact same thing during the finals.The injury to Wes McCauley cost the Bruins the Stanley Cup.
No. Do not like.
Looks like they're sticking with it. I guess it makes sense to try to have two effective top lines when you're missing 3 top six guys. My only beef is that "3rd line" is clearly not getting many minutes tonight so why not switch Frederic and Bjork to get Freddy some more time on ice.
I don’t like Coyle on the wing as well. The way I like the D lines now is how I wish they would stay. Five option agree. Like Clifton playing moreI have a few things I don't like to see in the line up, when I see more than one I'm not happy
1) Coyle on the wing
2) Players playing their off wing/handedness
3) 4th liners playing higher up
4) Lindholm in the line-up
5) Gryzlyck playing 1st pairing
Plus also they could adjust the lines accordingly how the game is going alongI have a few things I don't like to see in the line up, when I see more than one I'm not happy
1) Coyle on the wing
2) Players playing their off wing/handedness
3) 4th liners playing higher up
4) Lindholm in the line-up
5) Gryzlyck playing 1st pairing
Brrrrutal - by playing Lindholm they’re also reducing the effectiveness of one of the few legit forwards they have by forcing Coyle to the wing. It’s like deciding to clean a broken window with mayonnaise. Why make more problems?
at 5v5 | CF% | SF% | GF% | xGF% | SCF% | HDCF% | HDGF% |
Krejci/Coyle | 59.39 | 58.15 | 71.43 | 58.25 | 56.63 | 59.68 | 77.78 |
Brrrrutal - by playing Lindholm they’re also reducing the effectiveness of one of the few legit forwards they have by forcing Coyle to the wing. It’s like deciding to clean a broken window with mayonnaise. Why make more problems?
Looks like they're sticking with it. I guess it makes sense to try to have two effective top lines when you're missing 3 top six guys. My only beef is that "3rd line" is clearly not getting many minutes tonight so why not switch Frederic and Bjork to get Freddy some more time on ice.
What do you expect out of a fourth lineI don't know why they wouldn't move Kuraly up, or better yet, let Frederic center the line with Studnicka, put Bjork alongside, and roll Kuraly-Lindholm-Wagner as the offensively-inept, defensive match-up line.
i think a big guy would work well with them. wouldnt even have to be that skilled. josh anderson woulve been good. i think kassian would be good.Really, you think so? It didn't seem to work with Bjork, didn't seem to work with Studnicka....
Plus also they could adjust the lines accordingly how the game is going along
Think we're going to need an extra batch of cookies tonight.
With extra chocolate.
View attachment 389525