I need to vent because I'm so frustrated with this team and where the Sharks are at as an organisation.
This team is being punished for being slow to act, satisfied with the status quo, and shooting themselves in the foot.
The powerplay has been bad for years. The structure in the dzone has been awful for years. Only young skilled players are ever held accountable whilst others have been given a free pass for years (ahem.. Burns). The sharks' development structure has been bad for years - but what has ultimately changed? Nothing.
The Sharks were too slow to fire TMac until it was too late, they were too slow to fire DeBoer - then replace him with one of his staff who had the same philosophies and didn't want to change too much. The play style was past it's use by date, and the solution was to change the name and face, not the philosophy. Not to mention this coach failed at another club. But why focus at the NHL level?
Roy Sommer has been the coach of the Sharks' AHL affiliate for 20 years, and he has held that position despite not winning a thing. I would only need one hand (and probably not all the fingers) to count the amount of players who developed through the AHL team to be a solid contributor to the NHL team. But - nothing's changed. It's one of the biggest reasons I wanted Eklund to return to Sweden if he wasn't playing the Sharks - because he would not become a better player under Sommer in the Cuda.
Fans were told for years that the Sharks suffered in drafting for their moderate success, yet we had to watch as other teams in similar positions were able to turn late first round picks or later rounds into strong/good NHLers, whilst the Sharks had such spectacular prospects like Mirco Mueller, Nikolai Goldobin, Adam Helewka, Noah Rod, Freddie Hamilton. The only change to the scouting team was literally for DW to promote his son. That being said, I'm actually supportive of his changes in philosophy that he has brought it - but the point remains the Sharks stuck with the same scouting team.
The goaltending issues have been around for years and I'm not sure they've ever acted to address this. Jones was held onto for way too long, but given his slightly better play in Philly, I'm pretty confident in saying the goalies development/coaching at this club is horrendous at best. The most recent example is Melnichuk going from a real promising prospect that was performing in the KHL to a pumpkin in the AHL. Stalock, Greiss, etc. have all shown better performances once leaving the club. When Jones wasn't performing, it seemed like he was getting conflicting advice - i.e. he was too deep, he was too aggressive, he needed to be more explosive, he needed to be more reserved. Adin Hill's got similar issues - so what's being done to address them. Nabakov isn't getting results, so why is he being persisted with?
The extended period of relatively good success of this team was built around flexibility. There was a period where the longest deal on the books would have been 5 years, and whilst I note players expectations and demands changed - they cuffed themselves with 5-6 long term deals with big money and no move clauses as well. Why was there this change from a flexible approach? Was it DW's desperation for success that he over committed to these deals? If it was, why is he still in charge when it clearly didn't work?
The club needs a complete overhaul from top-down. There is literally no point in commencing a rebuild when the same old structures will result in the same old outcomes. Hoard draft picks and prospects, but are they going to develop with the Sharks systems? Probably not. Even from a business perspective - the TV deal continues to be awful, so crowds are going to be even more important - yet what's being done to actually encourage fans back into the building? They are going to be watching an awful product, so what incentives are there? All the work done to the lighting and ice, and it's still bad. At what point does Hasso look at the financials and say "enough is enough"?
/vent