plaidchuck
Registered User
Oh yeah I forgot when Vokoun got the tying goal to send us into OT. Silly meee
Without Vokoun the score is 4-2 Islanders and Martins goal doesn't even matter.
Oh yeah I forgot when Vokoun got the tying goal to send us into OT. Silly meee
I actually would like to see Bennett in the lineup not for his raw ability (which is impressive) but for the other elements he consistently seems to bring. Were I confident that he'd get some decent shifts on Malkin's line... I'd want him in the lineup even more. Because he, Neal and Geno seem like a really, really good combination. But I won't depress anyone by expounding on their virtues as a line any further.
As for your second point... I guess I can't help but agree. It's no secret that there isn't much actual instruction going on with this team. It took the coaching staff something like two years to tell Letang to make it a point to work on his shot.
Shizno, *YOU* have a better chance of stealing a game than Fleury.
He's Steve Blass, 40 years later. His career is basically over, he just hasn't fully realized it yet.
He has no chance to steal a win. None.
Fleury proponents are like Tebow fans. They're convinced that his has more ability than he does just because of some fluky success he had a few years ago.
It is really a strange phenomenon.
Although I get that everyone's down and optimism is hard to come by right now, I think people are underestimating the very real possibility that this could happen. If there was ever a roster that is capable of catching fire and rattling off 4 straight, it's this one. We have the guys that can completely take over games and sometimes all it takes is one good period.
Hoping one of the best two players in the world goes off for four straight games. Don't really have faith in Bylsma fielding an advantageous lineup or adjusting to the bruins style of play.
If Fleury is in, I'm betting on the Bruins. I could use some easy cash. Probably the over/under too. Over, obviously.
@pgshelly So FWIW, #Penguins lines: Kunitz-Crosby-Dupuis Cooke-Sutter-Neal Morrow-Jokinen-Adams Glass-Vitale-Kennedy (Bennett, Jeffrey)
Bennett not even on a practice line.
**** off DB. I hope you start MAF too.
No Iginla or Malkin at practice.
Still it doesn't look good.
Yeah, but if he and Jeffrey are skating by themselves and everyone else is on a line, I find it hard to believe BB is in the line-up.
Unless DB has mistaken being secretive for being smart.
Maybe Iggy will be a healthy scratch and Malkin will center Jeffrey and Bennett.
And Glass in ... ? Yep because that's all we need is even less cycling.
@MolinariPG Penguins showed a predictable line or two, like 14-87-9, but also showed Bennett-Murray-Engelland, which is a, uh, longshot for Game 2.
And Glass in ... ? Yep because that's all we need is even less cycling.
The only things missing are playoff mustache boy and burrito eating contests.
Nah... they're gonna HS Malkin. That's their big lineup change.
Second line now centered by Adams.
Bylsma is a ****ing joke
Maybe the changes Bylsma promised is to dress 8 dmen and Bennett. That was really our newly constructed 4th line! Stanley Cup here we come!
The latter makes the former infinitely more unlikely.
We need his physicality 10 minutes after somebody passes the puck.
I just don't understand why they don't realize they need sustained pressure. It seems as though they only want scoring off the rush. Just doesn't happen against good teams in the playoffs. I feel like I am watching the mid 90s team. Let's just bring in Hatcher while we're at it.
Unfortunately 100% true, but I gotta find a thread of hope (for myself) somewhere.