Adam Michaels
Registered User
Journalist on twitter, but I can't find it right now.
They were correct, as were you:
Journalist on twitter, but I can't find it right now.
Where'd you hear/read this?
Journalist on twitter, but I can't find it right now.
Next step would be to split the Chiarot - Weber pairing.
Kulak can’t play RD, which is also part of the issue but Edmundson canAt some point I think they should go with:
Edmundson-Petry
Romanov-Weber
Chiarot-Kulak
Kulak can’t play RD, which is also part of the issue but Edmundson can
Romanov-Weber
Chiarot-Petry
Kulak-Edmundson
Ducharme explained in Romanov's case, that they don't want to skip steps in his progression. He said that if you force him up the ladder too quickly, you might end up setting him even further back. He says they don't want to push him to where they see him right away. In other words, they see him in the Top-4, if not the top pair. But they don't want to expose him to that yet for fear it will set his development back.
Chiarot is simply miscast playing top line opposition which Romanov at present would be as well. Chiarot is a solid #4 Dman.Fair enough. With the way Chiarot is playing they have to look at moving him to the bottom pairing if he’s playing. What do you think the d pairings look if he’s there?
I also don’t think they should move Romanov up to the top pairing, move him to the 2nd to start with.
Ducharme explained in Romanov's case, that they don't want to skip steps in his progression. He said that if you force him up the ladder too quickly, you might end up setting him even further back. He says they don't want to push him to where they see him right away. In other words, they see him in the Top-4, if not the top pair. But they don't want to expose him to that yet for fear it will set his development back.
Ducharme explained in Romanov's case, that they don't want to skip steps in his progression. He said that if you force him up the ladder too quickly, you might end up setting him even further back. He says they don't want to push him to where they see him right away. In other words, they see him in the Top-4, if not the top pair. But they don't want to expose him to that yet for fear it will set his development back.
Chiarot is not a top 4 D on a good team. Terrific bottom pairing D I can agree onChiarot is simply miscast playing top line opposition which Romanov at present would be as well. Chiarot is a solid #4 Dman.
Ducharme explained in Romanov's case, that they don't want to skip steps in his progression. He said that if you force him up the ladder too quickly, you might end up setting him even further back. He says they don't want to push him to where they see him right away. In other words, they see him in the Top-4, if not the top pair. But they don't want to expose him to that yet for fear it will set his development back.
So Jets were out of their minds?Chiarot is not a top 4 D on a good team. Terrific bottom pairing D I can agree on
Dude I may have forgotten to name you in my appreciation post but I am getting old.Really awesome GDT, Conflicted! I love westerns and this is as epic as it gets!
Vancouver will be out for blood. Not sure it will matter though.Well, if it’s any consolation, we have a 2 game set with Vancouver this week. I know they just beat the 2020-2021 Stanley Cup champs, but the Leafs didn’t have the Canucks’ owner playing for them.
Maybe Toffoli will crack the 20 goal mark after Wednesday.
At some point I think they should go with:
Edmundson-Petry
Romanov-Weber
Chiarot-Kulak
Ducharme explained in Romanov's case, that they don't want to skip steps in his progression. He said that if you force him up the ladder too quickly, you might end up setting him even further back. He says they don't want to push him to where they see him right away. In other words, they see him in the Top-4, if not the top pair. But they don't want to expose him to that yet for fear it will set his development back.