Laurentide
Registered User
He couldn't, which is why he didn't. But the idiots who protested outside the arena showed their ignorance of how things work. Qualified coaching candidates of any linguistic stripe are almost never available during the season because they're all employed elsewhere. So when you fire a guy with 20 or so games left in a season you have no pool of candidates from which to choose so you promote the assistant. Everybody with a functioning brain knew, or ought to have known, that Cunneyworth was never going to be the coach beyond those 20 or so games so there was zero reason to protest. They gave him the job because the rules say that somebody has to stand there behind the bench.How on earth was Gauthier supposed to hire a guy like Babcock or Hitchcock as an interim Head Coach?
My argument is that if, hypothetically, a top-tier anglo coach with a winning pedigree were available and got hired there wouldn't have been much in the way of protest. Real fans care about winning and they realize that in order to win you need to hire the best people regardless of language. But that doesn't mean that they'll accept just any coach. If you hire a Babcock the fact that he doesn't speak French will be overlooked (as long as he wins, of course) because he's considered to be one of the best coaches in the game. But you hire some nobody like Cunneyworth? No, that's a bridge too far. Only francophone nobodies can get hired. If you hire an anglo he has to be elite.
And this gets us back to my point about Mark Hunter. Is he "elite" enough, at this point in his career, to earn a free pass on the language thing? Has he done enough elsewhere to have that kind of street cred with the Habs largely francophone fanbase? I'm not so sure he does. And his Habs pedigree is 35 years old and it was relatively brief and unremarkable. I'm not sure it buys him any slack either.