News Article: Friedman's 31 Thoughts: Habs Draft, Pacioretty, Jack Johnson & Mark Hunter

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
77,598
125,397
Montreal
It could work if we give him 2 years @ 5-6M and retain on his last year. (When we eventually swap him)

If they're signing Johnson for 2 years, then he'll be a stop gap . And I'd rather they hold onto Schlemko for that instead. Schlemko has two years left at 2.1M. So he'll be cheaper and the money they'd give Johnson could go to someone else instead.

Not to mention production wise, Johnson had 11 points in 77 games last year. Schlemko had 5 in 37, which prorates to 10 points in 77 games.

The year before, Johnson has 23 points in all 82 games. Schlemko had 18 in 62, which prorates to 24 points in 82 games.

So in terms of production, Schlemko is on a similar pace to Johnson, at the fraction of the cost.
 

Captain Mountain

Formerly Captain Wolverine
Jun 6, 2010
20,429
14,003
4M for 4 years. Offense dried up because they slid him down the depth chart. He asked for a trade because of it and they turned a deaf ear towards him.

Johnson is a gamble, but at 31, he's not over-the-hill. Playing with Weber would insulate him against his weaker defense. He's physical -- something we can use -- but takes himself out of the play, sometimes, to make a hit.

Johnson with Weber and DeHaan with Petry would be good. Alzner with Juulsen on the 3rd pair as Mete gets some seasoning in Laval. That only leaves Schlemko and Benn to dispose of, and getting rid of both should be quite doable.

At 27, deHaan is a good skater that can move the puck and is defensively reliable, enough to compensate for Petry's recurring brain farts and allow the RD to play an offensive role with less blowback.

It would be decent stop gap with MON picking good Ds this year and Brook, Fleury, Mete and Juulsen still developing at different levels.

I believe that a D of:

Johnson - Weber
DeHaan - Petry
Alzner - Juulsen

would be vastly better than what we had last year as soon as Weber got injured, which was almost right away at the start of the season.

Signing Johnson and DeHaan basically handcuffs Montreal into building around a below-average D-core (that is also the oldest in the league by a wide margin), with no centers and severely limits their ability to acqiure centers or rebuild. Jack Johnson has never been a great offensive D-man. He's had a couple of decent point production years by being spoon fed ideal PP time, which he shouldn't get here. And the number of players that can produce in heavy PP minutes isn't a short list. He's a poor possession defenceman and is really bad at coverage. Pairing him with Weber makes about as much sense as pairing Alzner with Weber did. JJ is a better puck mover than Alzner, but he's worse defensively and is also slow.

De Haan's a better D-man, but he's still not what Montreal really needs.
 

Le Barron de HF

Justin make me proud
Mar 12, 2008
16,292
3,953
Shawinigan
If they're signing Johnson for 2 years, then he'll be a stop gap . And I'd rather they hold onto Schlemko for that instead. Schlemko has two years left at 2.1M. So he'll be cheaper and the money they'd give Johnson could go to someone else instead.

Not to mention production wise, Johnson had 11 points in 77 games last year. Schlemko had 5 in 37, which prorates to 10 points in 77 games.

The year before, Johnson has 23 points in all 82 games. Schlemko had 18 in 62, which prorates to 24 points in 82 games.

So in terms of production, Schlemko is on a similar pace to Johnson, at the fraction of the cost.
By reputation alone, JJ holds more value than Schlemko, a la Plekanec. There was word that he was worth a first rounder at the deadline. Play him with Weber and make him look good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adam Michaels

habsgirl5000

Registered User
Jul 15, 2017
2,678
1,868
i guess MB is not finished destroying the defense yet.....signing JJ would be the cherry on top
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
8,907
8,627
You realized he hasn't signed him...yet.

Right?
Excuse me for being gunshy with this muppet at the helm but when Bobby Mac says its rumoured we are looking at him and there's a rumour he's looking at $5-6MM and it fits in the wheelhouse of what this guy has done I'll err on the negative side, if he can pull off an offseason of positivity I'll cut him some slack in October
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings

417

BBQ Chicken Alert!
Feb 20, 2003
51,367
27,815
Ottawa
Excuse me for being gunshy with this muppet at the helm but when Bobby Mac says its rumoured we are looking at him and there's a rumour he's looking at $5-6MM and it fits in the wheelhouse of what this guy has done I'll err on the negative side, if he can pull off an offseason of positivity I'll cut him some slack in October
If you're referring to his segment on 690 this morning - he wasn't the one to put that "rumor" out there.

He was being asked about JJ to Montreal because of Friedman's 31 thoughts article where he suggests that Montreal is a "stealth destination" for JJ.

There's nothing concrete tying the Habs to JJ beyond an obscure thought by Friedman.
 

Habaneros

Habs Cup champs 2010
Oct 31, 2011
16,503
6,934
Oddly enough, some people think the Habs can't get a 1st round pick for Pacioretty though....

Is there any rule in the NHL that limits time length on picks in a trade?

Let's say you took 2 1st rounders in a trade in 2018

1- 1st in 2019
2- 1st in 2026
Is that allowed?

In theory could you trade a player in 2018 and get a 1st round pick in 2035?

I like to try it ..lol gamble
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27

417

BBQ Chicken Alert!
Feb 20, 2003
51,367
27,815
Ottawa
Is there any rule in the NHL that limits time length on picks in a trade?

Let's say you took 2 1st rounders in a trade ...

1- 1st in 2019
2- 1st in 2026
Is that allowed?

In theory could you trade a player and get a say 1st round pick in 2035?

I like to try it ..lol gamble
Good question...I know it happens in the NBA quite a bit, but the NBA's trade system is much more complex than the NHL's.
 

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
20,687
11,284
You realized he hasn't signed him...yet.

Right?

Right. Some folks on this board are projecting their "fantasies" to make up a point or denigrate MB (which he deserves for his work the last couple of years)... . When did MB did what was expected from him ? Very rarely. Who predicted that Subban and Sergachev would be traded, or Alzner signed ? NOBODY ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27 and 417

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
8,907
8,627
If you're referring to his segment on 690 this morning - he wasn't the one to put that "rumor" out there.

He was being asked about JJ to Montreal because of Friedman's 31 thoughts article where he suggests that Montreal is a "stealth destination" for JJ.

There's nothing concrete tying the Habs to JJ beyond an obscure thought by Friedman.
I'll gladly eat crow to be wrong on this one, MB has used up his free passes so I'm expecting the worst at every turn until he can show me different on a consistent basis
 

417

BBQ Chicken Alert!
Feb 20, 2003
51,367
27,815
Ottawa
I'll gladly eat crow to be wrong on this one, MB has used up his free passes so I'm expecting the worst at every turn until he can show me different on a consistent basis
Well JJ may end up signing in Montreal and it may be for the amount MacKenzie said this morning (5-6M)...if that happens, then you'd have been fully justified.

Just seems like you're getting wound up for nothing at this point. As I said, there's nothing linking the Habs and JJ together beyond an obscure thought from Elliot Friedman (who has many thoughts, few of which are coherent these days) and perhaps their need for a LHD.
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
8,907
8,627
Right. Some folks on this board are projecting their "fantasies" to make up a point or denigrate MB (which he deserves for his work the last couple of years)... . When did MB did what was expected from him ? Very rarely. Who predicted that Subban and Sergachev would be traded, or Alzner signed ? NOBODY ?
That happens when you lose the trust and confidence of the majority of your fanbase, I'm just hoping he's hit rock bottom and only way is up but he's got a lot to prove
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
8,907
8,627
Well JJ may end up signing in Montreal and it may be for the amount MacKenzie said this morning (5-6M)...if that happens, then you'd have been fully justified.

Just seems like you're getting wound up for nothing at this point. As I said, there's nothing linking the Habs and JJ together beyond an obscure thought from Elliot Friedman (who has many thoughts, few of which are coherent these days) and perhaps their need for a LHD.
Not wound up at all, I find expecting the worst and either being validated or relieved is better than being optimistic and disappointed these days
 

417

BBQ Chicken Alert!
Feb 20, 2003
51,367
27,815
Ottawa
Not wound up at all, I find expecting the worst and either being validated or relieved is better than being optimistic and disappointed these days
Fair enough - I suppose this is the state of the fanbase at this point.

Even I, who I think i'm a very optimistic person by nature...have set extremely low expectations for this offseason.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
40,026
40,141
Can’t believe JJ sucks that much. He was one heck of a defenceman in the NCAA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417

417

BBQ Chicken Alert!
Feb 20, 2003
51,367
27,815
Ottawa
JJ asking for 6 million is fine. I could ask my boss for 500k a year too. Doesn’t mean I’ll get it.
I'm not even sure 5-6M is realistic...seems like MacKenzie just threw that number out there when prompted this morning, and suddenly, it's turned into gospel of what the Habs will be offering him.
 

Habaneros

Habs Cup champs 2010
Oct 31, 2011
16,503
6,934
Pierre McGuire doesn't see any reason John T goes back to NYI.

Then confirmed sightings this weekend of John T and Weber at the Grand Prix Montreal....

Remember P.A Parenteau what he said over a month ago , he bet his father JT would come to Montrea as UFA...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad