Crosside
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2018
- 4,742
- 1,846
Yes this oneWhat's the quote?
Is it this?
I looked at his last 3 articles and this is the best I could find looking into the off season.
Yes this oneWhat's the quote?
Is it this?
I looked at his last 3 articles and this is the best I could find looking into the off season.
That makes no mention of their 1sts. Key assets could be players...Yes this one
i guess the new regine shouldn't thenGreat idea. Worked really well the last two times it was attempted.
Maybe he is seeing things...I don't see these guys as 30 to 40 point players.
Career stats are 25 points averages. So thats what they are. I don't know where you see them as 40 point 3rd liners.
If you can get something decent for a late first you should do it. Especially since we have an early first and an early second right now. That’s the way I see it.Could see the Boston 1st moving, but I would be disappointed unless it was for a young NHL ready player/prospect.
The way I see it we lost the luxury of being able to trade that pick for immediate help when it was announced that one of our 1sts in the next 3 years will be confiscated.
Need that 1st to replenish the pipeline after going through the previous 2 drafts with no 1st and flubbing the 2021 draft badly.
If the late first gets you a young cost controlled player that fits a need, then you do it. Basically burn a few years of cost control for help now. I'm OK with that.If you can get something decent for a late first you should do it. Especially since we have an early first and an early second right now. That’s the way I see it.
Yeah I’m not trading for anyone who has one year left lol. Asking for trouble. I would trade for someone with 3 years. And I don’t think they would NEED to be young honestly.If the late first gets you a young cost controlled player that fits a need, then you do it. Basically burn a few years of cost control for help now. I'm OK with that.
Where the last regime failed (one of many), was trading firsts for players that didn't have enough term, or that wouldn't re-up (player fit aside).
Sounds good on paper but which team would want a first for an equivalent player? Maybe as part of a package.Apparently from Bruce. The team gonna trade one of ours first for a ready player
Well played.Maybe he is seeing things...
Had Chychrun been a RHD version of Methot instead of a LHD offensive minded guy we'd probably be happy with that move too, NYI seem to be doing well with Romanov for example,Making a move like late 1st + for a guy like Newhook would be a very smart usage of the ~25th pick.
Montreal are definitely quite happy with that move.
If you can get something decent for a late first you should do it. Especially since we have an early first and an early second right now. That’s the way I see it.
I would trade the late 1st for an extended Logan Thompson if possible(or better yet, try to use our 2nd instead).
50 contract limitHow is Boucher a disincentive? He's a prospect with upside, he might not add much in value but he doesn't take away, worst case you trade for him and he continues to be injured and it costs you 80k for his spot in the minors, he's still a guy with a lot of pro tools that could be an NHL player down the road.
Not sure there is a team out there who wouldnt give Boucher a 2yr ELC. Definitely not a disincentive. Your hatred of the pick is severely clouding your judgement.50 contract limit
Is there a maximum number of contracts permitted?
The maximum number of contracts per team permitted is as follows:
- Up until the day of the trade deadline, the NHL roster size limit is 23 (Non-roster, IR, LTIR, SOIR, etc. do not count to this limit). On and after the trade deadline, there is no roster size limit.
- Total NHL contracts per team = 50 (including two-way contracts and NHL contracts in the minors), players who meet the following three conditions do not count to this limit: 1. The player is 18 or 19 years of age. 2. Is in a junior or European league, and 3. who have not played 11 NHL games the current season.
- Total NHL players belonging to a team, including reserve lists = 90 (including roster, minor, prospects or drafted)
NHL CBA FAQ - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
NHL collective bargaining agreement (CBA) frequently asked questions and answerswww.capfriendly.com
Don't think either guy is the answer in the top 4 but one of the two for our third pair would be great.We should go after Vegas' D this off-season.
If they re-sign Hanifin they'll have the following D signed for next season:
Hanifin - Pietrangelo
McNabb - Theodore
Hague - Whitecloud
Hutton, Korczak
Would go hard after Whitecloud/Hague.
Hague has been playing at RD recently and has been looking good doing it. Played on the right side a fair bit in junior and it allowed him to better unleash his big shot.
Either guy would be a great pickup.
I hate Boucher? That news to me. LOL. I’m not sure I’ve even posted about him before. Take a look if you wish.Not sure there is a team out there who wouldnt give Boucher a 2yr ELC. Definitely not a disincentive. Your hatred of the pick is severely clouding your judgement.
This seems like a roundabout way of agreeing that calling Boucher a disincentive is wildly incorrect, so I'll take it.I hate Boucher? That news to me. LOL. I’m not sure I’ve even posted about him before. Take a look if you wish.
Boston has their own prospects so not sure that adding Boucher provides incentive and they value contract slots as all teams do. Boucher already has a ELC that extends to the of 2025-26, so that’s confusing as well.
I hate Boucher? That news to me. LOL. I’m not sure I’ve even posted about him before. Take a look if you wish.Not sure there is a team out there who wouldnt give Boucher a 2yr ELC. Definitely not a disincentive. Your hatred of the pick is severely clouding your judgement.
When it comes to making stuff up and inventing things, you are on a roll now.This seems like a roundabout way of agreeing that calling Boucher a disincentive is wildly incorrect, so I'll take it.
Lol.When it comes to making stuff up and inventing things, you are on a roll now.