- May 25, 2014
- 46,161
- 31,704
Last one at 1000, theres a poll due to high demand for polls
Heres the LAST one
FORMER Canucks thread Part TWO
Heres the LAST one
FORMER Canucks thread Part TWO
Dahlen with a PP assist playing on the top unit.
Clearly Tanev. said it at the time, we would regret letting him go.
Never a good idea to lose your best D man for nothing..
Dim deserves to have his name on the STanley cup this year if Calgary wins it.
Clearly Tanev. said it at the time, we would regret letting him go.
I've said it a number of times already but you had to keep Tanev. Even if the deal turned sour it would have been worth it for the good years you had. He wasn't just a key figure in the room, he was the key figure in the room.
RHD Jalen Chatfield just played 17:35 minutes for Carolina tonight…5 hits, 2 shots, -1…not that I was a huge fan, but he’s probably just as good or better than Poolman, at a fraction of the cost.
Tanev’s ticket out of town was clear when they signed #57. Like crystal clear.
Lee Sweatt hasn't been a Canuck for a while now & retired from hockey like around a decade ago.Tanev’s ticket out of town was clear when they signed #57. Like crystal clear.
Good for Jalen but c’mon now, he was terrible and Poolman is absolutely better (not saying he’s good)RHD Jalen Chatfield just played 17:35 minutes for Carolina tonight…5 hits, 2 shots, -1…not that I was a huge fan, but he’s probably just as good or better than Poolman, at a fraction of the cost.
Him and Marky were our defensive dynamic duo that Petey and Quinn could rely on on the ice as well as in the locker room.I've said it a number of times already but you had to keep Tanev. Even if the deal turned sour it would have been worth it for the good years you had. He wasn't just a key figure in the room, he was the key figure in the room.
Tanev’s ticket out of town was clear when they signed #57. Like crystal clear.