FORMER Canucks Part |||

[M2Beezy]

Last one at 1000, theres a poll due to high demand for polls

Heres the LAST one

FORMER Canucks thread Part TWO

Click to read more...

 

[Grub]

Tanev. Tanev is at his prime right now and not missing a single game.

 

[likash]

Tanev because he also had a very good synergy with Hughes. When you lost Tanev you also handicapped Hughes.

 

[Dab]

Tanev or Forsling.

 

[David Bruce Banner]

So many bad ones, but giving up on young, talented, cost effective players like McCann is not just stupid, it’s careless.

 

[timw33]

Dahlen with a PP assist playing on the top unit.

 

[KingofSurrey]

Dahlen with a PP assist playing on the top unit.

Dahlin wasn't good enough to play for the canucks...

Fire dim... and greener...

 

[ahmon]

Clearly Tanev. said it at the time, we would regret letting him go.

 

[KingofSurrey]

Clearly Tanev. said it at the time, we would regret letting him go.

Never a good idea to lose your best D man for nothing..

Dim deserves to have his name on the STanley cup this year if Calgary wins it.

 

[EpochLink]

Never a good idea to lose your best D man for nothing..

Dim deserves to have his name on the STanley cup this year if Calgary wins it.

We will be shoved down our throats 'the red mile' all summer long.
Good lord, yuck.

 

[canuckking1]

MCcan because he’s one of the few players I don’t think would’ve flopped in the Canucks school of backwards development.

 

[CanucksSayEh]

Team is now likely considering trading one of our best forwards for a RHD....

.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[KingofSurrey]

Clearly Tanev. said it at the time, we would regret letting him go.

Should have kept Tanev... and let Dim walk...

 

[rypper]

I've said it a number of times already but you had to keep Tanev. Even if the deal turned sour it would have been worth it for the good years you had. He wasn't just a key figure in the room, he was the key figure in the room.

 

[KingofSurrey]

I've said it a number of times already but you had to keep Tanev. Even if the deal turned sour it would have been worth it for the good years you had. He wasn't just a key figure in the room, he was the key figure in the room.

Yah like you think the OEL or the Myers deal will end well for us...
Tanev's deal would have been a bargain in comparison.

 

[Canucker]

RHD Jalen Chatfield just played 17:35 minutes for Carolina tonight…5 hits, 2 shots, -1…not that I was a huge fan, but he’s probably just as good or better than Poolman, at a fraction of the cost.

 

[HockeyWooot]

RHD Jalen Chatfield just played 17:35 minutes for Carolina tonight…5 hits, 2 shots, -1…not that I was a huge fan, but he’s probably just as good or better than Poolman, at a fraction of the cost.

I think there’s something to the suggestion that TGs system inhibits most defenders from playing at their best.

 

[HockeyWooot]

It’s Tanev for me. Leader in the room, was a fit, wanted to be here. Can’t believe they dropped him, let alone the manner done.

For the youngsters it’s Forsling. I can’t believe we traded him after that breakout WJC performance for waiver fodder in Clendenning. As an undersized dman one would expect he would take some more time to develop but he had obvious skill. He was a late round pick so you would expect to have him take a bit of time.Strong IQ and puck moving abilities.

McCann would be nice, but I don’t think he would have been the player he is now without bouncing around the league first. Sort of like Grabner.

 

[4Twenty]

Tanev’s ticket out of town was clear when they signed #57. Like crystal clear.

 

[ahmon]

Tanev’s ticket out of town was clear when they signed #57. Like crystal clear.

which is a huge mistake.

 

[Hit the post]

Tanev’s ticket out of town was clear when they signed #57. Like crystal clear.

Lee Sweatt hasn't been a Canuck for a while now & retired from hockey like around a decade ago.

 

[wonton15]

RHD Jalen Chatfield just played 17:35 minutes for Carolina tonight…5 hits, 2 shots, -1…not that I was a huge fan, but he’s probably just as good or better than Poolman, at a fraction of the cost.

Good for Jalen but c’mon now, he was terrible and Poolman is absolutely better (not saying he’s good)

 

[mathonwy]

I've said it a number of times already but you had to keep Tanev. Even if the deal turned sour it would have been worth it for the good years you had. He wasn't just a key figure in the room, he was the key figure in the room.

Him and Marky were our defensive dynamic duo that Petey and Quinn could rely on on the ice as well as in the locker room.

Both of them were true mentors and our FO literally had no ducking clue.

 

[ChilliBilly]

honestly thought Gadjjovich would be doing better ...

 

[KingofSurrey]

Tanev’s ticket out of town was clear when they signed #57. Like crystal clear.

No i think ( signing 57 over tanev.... ) it was more like crystal Meth....