GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 187,394
- 39,390
He would have been an RFA only if he had played 66 games, which was unlikely to happen. Lyubimov and Laughton and then Leier were ahead of him on the depth chart for the first half of this season because after a year of barely playing hockey me needed a lot of AHL minutes to get his mojo back.
Saying that Lindblom won't see the NHL next year is ****ing ridiculous, even for you.
I'm not looking to stray too far here from the actual topic, which is Vecchione and whether or not he makes the team, but like with Weal last year and Lindblom next year, we just won't know until next year, and you can't make assumptions given the short history of this coach. Weal may not have played 66 games, but maybe he could have and it would have been to the benefit of the long-term vision of the organization. I wouldn't say it was 'unlikely' had he made the team since Konecny is up to 65 right now (would be more without injuries) and Vandevelde is up to 77. He didn't look slow or sluggish in pre-season to assume that he needed that AHL run, we know that spot was down to Weal and Konecny (for a job that was in the top 9 group of forwards), if Weal won it, the fact he only played 14 games last year would have never entered the equation.
As for Lindblom, I'm just not convinced that Hakstol will let him do it. He has to be going into Hextall's office every day begging that Vandevelde is brought back. I think Lindblom should be fine, there's nothing he needs to sell me on. Hopefully some of this driftwood can be cleared out, and then he'll still have to have a really good pre-season and it's not a concern. Not truly difficult reasoning, you're smart enough to understand a difference in opinion without resorting to insults. Unless you're not aware of the spots Hakstol puts Vandevelde and Bellemare in at the expense of better players. I think you are, I think others think you do too, maybe I'm wrong.