- Sep 22, 2011
- 11,439
- 11,953
Gee, trade for/sign a past his prime #1 D? Do we really need a repeat of the Leetch/Coffey years?
No thanks.
No thanks.
Honestly ask yourself....has a team that was 1st overall in the regular season, the league's best GAA in the regular season ever decided to do a rebuild the following year?
This isn't a bad team. They have most of their group under contract. Sadly this board will spend most of next season constantly harping that they aren't as good as TB, a team two wins away from a cup.
I can see letting Chara walk. I can see even looking around to maybe move Rask and bring in someone else (they can't just go with Halak/Vlader next year, that's a playoff DNQ waiting to happen).
But if they are going to start looking at moving Krejci or Rask for picks/prospects, then why stop there? Just as well go all the way and start seeing what they can get for Bergeron and Marchand too.
Keith for Debrusk resigned at 4.5-5?? Keith has 2 years left at 5.5 and about 2-3 left of good play. replaces krugs minutes easily.
well someone hasnt watched the blackhawks. on track for 36 points, logging 24 min a game, penalty kill anchor. he would be your 3rd best d man if krug is gone.
To answer your first question (assuming that it wasn't rhetorical): no. However, I believe that the current core can no longer get it done to win another Stanley Cup. So, I've suggested that Boston do a retool/small rebuild and have been proposing that Chara not be brought back and that Rask (if he doesn't retire) and Krejci be traded. For the latter two, at least Boston would get some assets (players and/or picks) back instead of letting them walk away for nothing at the end of next season.
As for "why stop there?", the obvious point is that both Marchand and Bergeron both have NMCs (well, Bergeron has a list of three teams where can be traded to, beginning next season) and I doubt that management is entertaining dealing either one. The Bruins can still ice a playoff team without Krug, Chara, Rask and Krejci. The current core isn't going to win another Stanley Cup, anyway, so why not remake the team, bring in some younger blood, recoup draft picks and build for the future?
Well they also won three rounds with home ice advantageWhat did home ice advantage do for them in last year's final?
Covid is something that all teams encountered with no home ice advantage, you just have to suck it up and do your best in this environment.
The Bruins really do need a re-tooling as shown by their lack of offensive prowess. You can only hang on for so long with 1 line producing and Bergeron is not getting any younger. To me Krecji and Bergeron are becoming quite fragile due to their years of wear and tear.
I would not blame it on Covid but the Bruins inability to come back due to their current situation was a major factor.
Yup! Missed it.
I hope folks don’t mistake my feeling that Rask will be dealt for desire. I’m a forever Tuukka fanboy and I don’t blame him one iota for his decision to head home. I just know that there are countless other Bruins fans who disagree with me. Coupled with his salary and management’s ambition to shake up the roster, a trade feels like a likely outcome.
Hmmmmm, I've heard this before.
Even in your post though, there are a significant amount of moving parts that you feel need to happen to get a kick at the can. More than what happens in a typical offseason, that's for sure. Subtract two top 4 defenders, add one, add a top 6 winger, shop your starting goalie. That's blow it up stuff you're talking about....and all needs to be done within a significantly shortened offseason.
Say for example, Colorado calls you up and says "Hey, we're all in, we'll give you Compher, Newhook, and Byram for Bergeron", I sure as hell am not saying no to that because we want a feel good story of Bergeron riding off into the sunset here.
In my mind, I agree that no one is untouchable ever, but especially anyone above 30. The Bruins will be around much longer than anyone on the roster, so the goal should always be improve the franchise.
Close means very little and I think this team as is will not advance to the finals again. If fans are willing to go 1 or 2 rounds in the playoffs well then stand pat.Well they also won three rounds with home ice advantage
Assuming he can pass an in depth physical of his shoulder I'd be interested, especially for Bjork whom I feel doesn't have a spot here no matter how I fudge with the lineupLet’s talk Josh Anderson
he’s available and Bruins have the Cap room and the space as well as likely players they could toss back
RFA
1/3 in 26 Games
just what is he really ?
My TAKE
I’m Columbus I’m scared shitless paying this guy
Bruins ?
I see him playing the MoJo part heavier game, different style but effective
slot him on third line next to Coyle - big heavy line with two guys who’ve atleast scored 20 goals in a season
I don’t see him anywhere but third line so that’s his value - gambling on his health and not paying for 2018-19 in salary or return
you basically have to end the Senyshyn in Boston which many will have no problem
what’s it going to cost?
0.0 I give up Frederic or Vaakanainen
Bjork seems logical
Obviously in no position to know how they feel about Zboril, Senyshyn etc
Assuming he can pass an in depth physical of his shoulder I'd be interested, especially for Bjork whom I feel doesn't have a spot here no matter how I fudge with the lineup
Oh my mantra was 2020 cup or bust. Going to the finals 2 strait year doesnt happen often. All I wanted was a cup. We didn’t do enough the past two years to do that. Let’s hope the right moves happen and we can celebrate in 2021.Close means very little and I think this team as is will not advance to the finals again. If fans are willing to go 1 or 2 rounds in the playoffs well then stand pat.
Let’s talk Josh Anderson
Here’s what Chiasson brings
we wont be competing in the next 2-3 years...thats still in your window. do you get it?If he's that good keep him.
If that's who the Bruins target with assets, I've officially given up on their pro scouting team.Hearing it’s a done deal - Chiasson from EDM for Bjork. Doesn’t really make me giddy I’d much rather KEEP BJORK
Here’s what Chiasson brings
Alex Chiasson is a keeper for Edmonton Oilers but Jujhar Khaira? Hmm
if the cap situation came down to it and i was still trying to compete yes. are you keeping krug chara? who are your left D going forward if you cant afford krug?Would you trade a 23 year old 2nd line winger for a 37 year old defensemen with a cap hit of over $5.5 million for the next 3 seasons ( not 2 seasons like you said ) ???? I kind of doubt it.
I would rather have a LD of Zboril, Lauzon and Vaakanainen than trade Debrusk for Keith.if the cap situation came down to it and i was still trying to compete yes. are you keeping krug chara? who are your left D going forward if you cant afford krug?
Hearing it’s a done deal - Chiasson from EDM for Bjork. Doesn’t really make me giddy I’d much rather KEEP BJORK
Here’s what Chiasson brings
Alex Chiasson is a keeper for Edmonton Oilers but Jujhar Khaira? Hmm
i think the counter is that a lot of people here think the B's won't really be competing, so why prolong a window of pretender-ing?we wont be competing in the next 2-3 years...thats still in your window. do you get it?
if the cap situation came down to it and i was still trying to compete yes.
He’s on my SIM team ~ I have watched him since college and his four goals in four NHL games debutHearing it’s a done deal - Chiasson from EDM for Bjork. Doesn’t really make me giddy I’d much rather KEEP BJORK
Here’s what Chiasson brings
Alex Chiasson is a keeper for Edmonton Oilers but Jujhar Khaira? Hmm
if the cap situation came down to it and i was still trying to compete yes. are you keeping krug chara? who are your left D going forward if you cant afford krug?
Grzelcyk & Lauzon would be in my lineupif the cap situation came down to it and i was still trying to compete yes. are you keeping krug chara? who are your left D going forward if you cant afford krug?