No we dont. Go watch the pens game I think it was. That’s dominant for a d man.We really need to talk about the definition of domination homie.
No we dont. Go watch the pens game I think it was. That’s dominant for a d man.We really need to talk about the definition of domination homie.
No we dont. Go watch the pens game I think it was. That’s dominant for a d man.
That’s today’s nhl. Where players playing against the best on the planet for over 20 mins a night get destroyed regularly through stretches of games, get walked, get exposed. Rarely they play as good as Matheson that game and those few games around that time when he wasYou have a low standard for dominate then
That’s today’s nhl. Where players playing against the best on the planet for over 20 mins a night get destroyed regularly through stretches of games, get walked, get exposed. Rarely they play as good as Matheson that game and those few games around that time when he was
Lights out. So yes that is dominant. Defensively speaking.
One game = Long StretchesYou have a low standard for dominate then
One game = Long Stretches
MM would flash his skills each game, but more often then not it was followed by one or two early career Kulikov level blunders. I think Q will help him, but I dont see it as an intelligence thing, they just need to let him play more to his strengths, and get him a veteran defensive minded partner!
I think we could live with Yands and Ekblad on a pair together once Q fixes the defensive scheme.Sounds great when Yandle, Ek and Math each needs a veteran, defensive dman partner.
I think we could live with Yands and Ekblad on a pair together once Q fixes the defensive scheme.
Ek took huge strides this season defensively
Development of our prospects and players has been good to excellent imo. Maybe back in the Horton and Weiss days it stunk.I think the coaching issues of the past two years are going to become blatantly obvious next year, and I think better coaching will really help Matheson. Unfortunately for him, he came on board just as all the bs around the team happened. As it happens so often with this team, his development was bungled. A better coach, a better system, more stability, more accountability; I think all of that will amount to a much better Matheson going forward.
Development of our prospects and players has been good to excellent imo. Maybe back in the Horton and Weiss days it stunk.
Fair enough. I’m curious to see if Q can fix his game.I guess I was referring to the various prospects whose development was bungled by this team.
With regards to my comment and the within the context of my post, I think Matheson's development and as a result his performance to date has been hampered by playing too many minutes too quickly and by having to play for mediocre coaches. I feel better about Matheson going forward now that we have a good, veteran coach.
I think he’d be a terrible forward to be honest. His go to move is to try and speed on the boards and get crunched and lose the puck.I’d like to see Matheson play a game as a forward. I think he’d be good. He has wheels and moderate defensive ability To go along with pretty good offensive skills. Versatility could only help his value to the team at this point.
I love how he's done like 50 interviews since getting hired.
It's hilarious that fans keep harping that Florida fans dont know hockey.
But then a coach and a damn ****ty temporary tattoo is selling and he is driving ticket sales.
A coach. Not a player. A top notch coach.