Man I dont know. Watching the 2nd I saw multiple good chances off of passing plays. The Flames were lucky some missed the net. This website is horrible on my phone so I wasn't able to respond but when I looked the Flyers had like 8 high danger chances at 5v5 to the Flames 3.They had like 4 all game, and scored on 3 of em
You'd be wrong. 4.35 to 1.98 expected goals. 81.5/18.5 expected win rate on money puck.Man I dont know. Watching the 2nd I saw multiple good chances off of passing plays. The Flames were lucky some missed the net. This website is horrible on my phone so I wasn't able to respond but when I looked the Flyers had like 8 high danger chances at 5v5 to the Flames 3.
At the end of the 2nd it was 1.69-1.63 Philly at 5v5. When I initially posted that it was more in the Flyers favor.You'd be wrong. 4.35 to 1.98 expected goals. 81.5/18.5 expected win rate on money puck.
That's all fair, yep.At the end of the 2nd it was 1.69-1.63 Philly at 5v5. When I initially posted that it was more in the Flyers favor.
They went into a complete turtle after getting a 3-1 lead and now it's skewed in the Flames favor.
Regardless their best player left injured, reffing has massively favored us, we're facing a random AHL goalie. If it wasn't lopsided in the Flames favor I'd be very concerned.
The only high danger they had at the point that didn't go in was the goal line trickler that Andersson saved. Were the goals markstroms fault? No. But if he can't stop any high danger chances he faces then he's a pointless player.Man I dont know. Watching the 2nd I saw multiple good chances off of passing plays. The Flames were lucky some missed the net. This website is horrible on my phone so I wasn't able to respond but when I looked the Flyers had like 8 high danger chances at 5v5 to the Flames 3.
Our d is equally at fault if not more at fault. Just look at goals 1, 2, and 4. Singling Markstrom out (even though he’s been trash this year) is just misattributing the problemThe only high danger they had at the point that didn't go in was the goal line trickler that Andersson saved. Were the goals markstroms fault? No. But if he can't stop any high danger chances he faces then he's a pointless player.
He needs to make a damn clutch save when we need it, he hasnt done that all year. The D let's some high danger scoring chances, but it's not the Ds job to let in no high danger chances. Virtually any remotely dangerous shot has gone in this yr, markstrom deserves all the shit he gets. He is exactly what Elliot was when he was with us. Faces virtually no danger, still let's in 2 a game and gives the team no confidence.Did Huberdeau play today? Noticed him maybe one time in the last 40 minutes.
For all the expected goal / expected win garbage that we somehow dominate, we give up like 7 grade A chances against probably the worst offense in the league. Marky was bad, our d was also beyond terrible. That first goal was a joke on Hanifin and Rasmus, Hanifin another terrible play on the puck for the 2nd goal, and the 4th goal was basically a blue line turnover leading to an in-zone 2 on 1 and zad completely misplayed it while Pelletier got caught flat footed. Our d is god awful considering we were playing a team led by Wade Alison and Hayes.
Get rid of Hanifin, consider getting rid of Zadorov, and replace with two actually steady dmen. Jesus what a brutal gaame
Our d is equally at fault if not more at fault. Just look at goals 1, 2, and 4. Singling Markstrom out (even though he’s been trash this year) is just misattributing the problem