Actually, yes it is that simple. Sure, some people have very unique metabolism..all this means is they have to eat even more, which goes back to what I'm saying.Meh in general terms yes, but I don't believe it is as clear cut as you make it sound, some individuals have some metabolic predispositions different from others. It can also be a question of how much food intake your brain is telling you to consume, which it isn't simple to go against your biological impulses. There are reasons why most contestants from the Biggest Losers end up regaining their weight even if they were well-intentioned and many kept a strict exercising regime.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and make two assumptions:
1) You do not know your TDEE.
2) You do not know your daily caloric intake.
Am I right or am I right?
Hmmm...a few things here."It has to do with resting metabolism, which determines how many calories a person burns when at rest. When the show began, the contestants, though hugely overweight, had normal metabolisms for their size, meaning they were burning a normal number of calories for people of their weight. When it ended, their metabolisms had slowed radically and their bodies were not burning enough calories to maintain their thinner sizes."
1) Rapid weight loss slows down your metabolism isn't new.
2) Humans are creatures of habit, a few months of eating fruits instead of chips and exercising isn't going to crush almost a lifetime of terribly unhealthy conduct.
3) The grueling regimen they're on during the shows is completely unsustainable.
4) While the findings are interesting, the study is completely uncontrolled, which means they can be eating Mcdonalds 3x/day and not exercising.
Matter of fact, the first thing the winner of season one did was get himself a burger and fries...eventually getting back to his bad ways again.
I don't need a PHD to know that people that go on these types of diets like.."smoothie diet''..''cookie diet''..''soup diet''...etc...are all going to put their weight back up.
Finally, this does not go against anything I said. It's all about knowing how much calories you need. If you have a fast metabolism, which is what you are hinting towards, well fine, that means you need to be even more aware of your quantities.
Which shows that weight gain/loss isn't as simple as a pure equation of calories intake/burned. Inversely to them, I am sure it is more difficult for me than average to put on weight, particularly fat. I know I am thin, so I already always been trying to eat a bit more than what I feel like I need, but my weight never goes up, even in the stretches where I am not exercising and I should normally mathematically been over-consuming calories. I am not saying gaining weight is impossible for me, but like I said previously I would need to put a lot of effort on planning and forcing myself to eat constantly.
Again. Yes It is. You just need to eat even more (or less) depeding on your body type and goals.
Do you even know ''how much you need''? Because you don't go on a ''feel'' system when trying to add weight, especially not if you have a very fast metabolism. Packing on weight will always feel like you're forcing yourself to eat.
If all you do is eat when you're hungry, or whatever your parents got you used to (breakfast-lunch-dinner), then you won't put jack crap on.
Look at bodybuilders, the sport where putting on/off weight and jacking up your muscles is pretty much the objective. They are constantly tracking their foods to meet their goals. You'll have to do the same, but at the end of the day, it's simply about knowing how much you need, and eating those ratios.