VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 25,488
- 11,964
Hope to see you at the next oneAnother solid overnight drama fest for me to read upon waking up. Way to go team
Hope to see you at the next oneAnother solid overnight drama fest for me to read upon waking up. Way to go team
Sadly I am old and boring. Up early sleep early.Hope to see you at the next one
Can I have the title of best pairing now?
Rielly-Jones
I dunno man.Can I have the title of best pairing now?
Rielly-Jones
So like... did @belair actually quit because he was skipped?
I can play Giroux at 1C right?
I think across 3 games we've seen him at C and W depending on the team, so that's good. I'll just see who lasts and if there's a great C grab them and if not Giroux is C.I don't mind it.
Most of his best years were at center.
I think across 3 games we've seen him at C and W depending on the team, so that's good. I'll just see who lasts and if there's a great C grab them and if not Giroux is C.
He played just over 30% of this season at center.
I'm fine with him there, but don't be surprised if some will dock you a little for it.
That's true, but his move to wing was more to facilitate him playing on the same line as Couturier. He's been a center for most of his career, I don't see why people would expect him to suddenly lose his ability to play center.
Yeah, if the centre I really like lasts I'll probably take him and shift Giroux to wing but idk yetI know, but it's been a topic of debate before
It's the type of little thing that I think someone could use as a tiebreaker in a close matchup honestly
I think I’m the main advocate for Giroux at the W vs C. Basically he needs the right wingers to get the best out of him from C. I do think Kane and Giroux would be great together though.That's true, but his move to wing was more to facilitate him playing on the same line as Couturier. He's been a center for most of his career, I don't see why people would expect him to suddenly lose his ability to play center.
Screw it Giroux is a C. Debate done. x-Giroux-KaneI think I’m the main advocate for Giroux at the W vs C. Basically he needs the right wingers to get the best out of him from C. I do think Kane and Giroux would be great together though.
Can I have the title of best pairing now?
Rielly-Jones
I dunno man.
Carlson-Player to be named later is pretty dope too.
Another solid overnight drama fest for me to read upon waking up. Way to go team
I do think there’s one C out there though that would be great with that line but even if you don’t get him that line will be good.Screw it Giroux is a C. Debate done. x-Giroux-Kane
I agree, but I wonder if we're thinking the same CI do think there’s one C out there though that would be great with that line but even if you don’t get him that line will be good.