DFAC
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2008
- 7,308
- 4,903
Do we have the worst bottom 6 in the NHL?
You bet.Is there any player we would want from Buffalo?
Little more than thatHard to say for me as I haven’t seen or looked at a lot of the other teams with this season, but we are most definitely in the top 3 worst, we have an X factor too where we have ample dead cap that you can include if you are so inclined
our 5th line
Loui Baertschi Spooner 10 million
Somebody ran the numbers on this forum the other day. The Canucks bottom 6 ranks 30th of 31 teams on point production.Do we have the worst bottom 6 in the NHL?
Is there any player we would want from Buffalo?
Do we have the worst bottom 6 in the NHL?
Looking at that roster, other than the obvious young/good (expensive) guys like Eichel/Reinhart/Olofsson/Dahlin/Cozens there really isn't anyone who would be of any interest.
If we were in a playoff position, Jake McCabe as a rental for a 4th rounder maybe? But we aren't.
Looking at that roster, other than the obvious young/good (expensive) guys like Eichel/Reinhart/Olofsson/Dahlin/Cozens there really isn't anyone who would be of any interest.
If we were in a playoff position, Jake McCabe as a rental for a 4th rounder maybe? But we aren't.
I would trade one of Roussel/Beagle for Colin Miller. Would give us a right-side D upgrade for $1.8M net cap hit, far better than anything we're likely to do this off-season.
McCabe is out of the rest of the season with a knee injury anyway.
Ha, good call. Solid enough 3rd pairing defender, though.
The worst part of the "bottom six" issue to me is that somehow the Canucks have an extremely overpriced bottom six and yet the ONLY player in the bottom six that you should spend big money on is a good 3rd line center.. and that's what they desperately need.
The worst part of the "bottom six" issue to me is that somehow the Canucks have an extremely overpriced bottom six and yet the ONLY player in the bottom six that you should spend big money on is a good 3rd line center.. and that's what they desperately need.
Haven't done one of these in a while.
Obviously next year won't be a realistic chance to succeed given the amount of crap still on our books. The following year is when things open up and we can take a serious run (hopefully without Benning). My pipedream is that we sign Scott Laughton for $3M this offseason and then Barkov for $10M and Nick Paul for $2.5M next offseason. All of the rest of the spots can be filled internally. 2022-2023 roster and cap numbers would look some like (guessing for some internal contracts):
EP ($8.5M) - Barkov ($10M) - Boeser ($7.5M)
Miller ($5.25M) - Horvat ($5.5M) - Hoglander ($1M)
Podkolzin ($1M) - Laughton ($3M) - Gaudette/Lind/Jasek/Lockwood ($1M)
Gadjovich ($1M) - Paul ($2.5M) - Gaudette/Lind/Jasek/Lockwood ($1M)
Hughes ($8.5M) - Woo ($1M)
Rathbone ($3M) - Schmidt (5.95M)
Juolevi ($2M) - Myers ($6M)
Demko ($5M)
Dipietro ($1M)
Total: $79.7M
Ha, good call. Solid enough 3rd pairing defender, though.
I think he's more than that. His defensive impact is very strong. I think if you could add a guy like McCabe (or Ryan Murray, who has injury risk but also a history of strong defensive play), I think you could pair him with Schmidt for an effective shutdown pair.
This is a strange "pipe dream" scenario. After the years of discussion over how inefficient our bottom-six is, I don't know why we'd want to commit medium money and term to average-ish bottom sixers in Laughton and Paul. I dunno why some people here have this obsession with Laughton. He's okay, but I wouldn't chase him. Fill the bottom-six with bargain-basement guys and our own prospects (Trent Cull seems to think Lind and Jasek have made great strides all around and are close).
I'd love Barkov too, but he won't be available. It's much more important to upgrade the right-defense spot anyway, because I don't think Woo is really even going to be NHL calibre. Dumping Myers (somehow) should be a priority too.
I don’t know if Petey and Hughes will sign long term deals, but it sure would be great to lock them up with your suggested dollar and term.Do you think the Canucks (a) could and (b) should lock up Hughes and Petey to $8m x 8 years each right now?
Seems like a prudent move given the current cap conditions.