Rather target Colorado.
Try to get Newhook and Timmins.
Someone should show him Back to the Future.Hypothetically targeting Colorado or other playoff bound teams desperate to make a push would be very shrewd. But Benning doesn't have enough time.
Yet he has time to dye his hair pitch black.Hypothetically targeting Colorado or other playoff bound teams desperate to make a push would be very shrewd. But Benning doesn't have enough time.
I am completely against trading a 1st round pick for a 27 year old defenseman who can't stay healthy, and would be 1 year away from being a UFA. That trade could end up being a complete disaster.
You're not wrong with what the Canucks need (though subtract the "-ish"). I would add we need another top 6 winger, and one more top 4-defensemen in addition to the one you have identified.
I absolutely would look to move JT Miller because he'll be 28 in a month and by the time the Canucks should be on their upswing he'll be 30+. His next contract will be a bad one, so trade him while he's at his peak value.
Having said that, if we can get someone like Matt Dumba (27 in July) fairly cheap then it's a move I make. Unless Minnesota is planning on keeping 4 defensemen they have no room to keep Dumba. The price shouldn't be too high. I'm still looking at Vince Dunn but would not pay the 1st round pick asking price.
This season is a write-off. As is next season. At the end of the day what the Canucks need to be focused on is banking as many draft picks and prospects as they can, while building the best group of 7 forwards, 3 defensemen and 1 goalie as they can. Taking advantage of teams with surplus in those areas and acquiring those players at discounted prices ahead of Seattle.
I'm comfortable with Demko as our 1G. Our D protected list should only include Nate Schmidt right now (since Hughes is exempt). That leaves 2 open slots to bring in 2 solid defensemen. And our forward list should include Pettersson, Horvat, Boeser, and JT Miller (unless he is dealt). That leaves 3/4 open spots.
Trading Miller would be too risky and not worth it. PPG stud winger in his prime dont grow on trees. Trade him and Pettersson/Horvat want out. Those guys want quality linemates.
2021 and 2022 first round picks should absolutely be in play for a 22-28 legit top 4 dman that fits the young core.
The top 6 is set for the future
Miller - Pettersson - Boeser
Hoglander - Horvat - Podkolzin
I also like Demko as our future #1
All the focus should be on improving the defence. Lindholm/Ekholm/Hamilton should be targets.
Pretty sure Lin Manuel Miranda is available.If Canucks have a legit shot at signing Hamilton then I’d be ok with the Canucks attaching a lot to get Myers the hell out of here. Otherwise it’d be easier to just wait it out and move him when he has less years.
Elliote saying teams don't like the extra year on Virtanen. Lol. Throw that on the pile of contracts that immediately backfired.
Guys on the radio saying David Poille is on the outs in Nashville. Would he be a good guy to have here in the President role?Don't want bimbo jimbo making any trades. Just go away. Go back to Boston and ruin them.
It’s official, Nucks players have joined tank nation.It would be optimistic to believe with every embarrassing loss incurred we were one step closer to seeing a shift in management but I’m conditioned to believe the Canucks will continue to chase their loses rather than walk away from the table
this entire season will feel like a success if we fire benning
part of me thinks the problems in the dressing room is players realizing this management team doesn’t have the ability to make them legit when their is almost more money off the ice then on the ice
alas I think we still have the core we need and despite the teams lack of success those players will be paid accordingly
Not a fan of making a trade, just to 'shake things up' because the team is on a losing streak...You're not exactly coming from a position of strength here.Have to think the first Gaudette/Virtanen domino falls this week. Virtanen would probably be waiver bait if it wasn't for the hysterics it was cause of having a local, top-10 pick put on waivers.
Not a fan of making a trade, just to 'shake things up' because the team is on a losing streak...You're not exactly coming from a position of strength here.
Trading Jake isnt going to make the slightest bit of difference right now.
Should Benning be the guy to make any moves though? Maybe the only change should be getting a new President and GM, like what the Pen’s are now doing? Get new leadership in now, and let them evaluate the situation, and make changes as they see best.Here's why trading him now makes sense:
1) Moving Virtanen would be to move on from the 2nd year of that contract. Right now you have a regular healthy scratch and that money can be used elsewhere.
2) You would also be doing it to hopefully gain an asset - whether a prospect, draft pick, or other player that is useful right now.
3) There is some sort of chemistry issue going on in the room. Moving a guy out and a different guy changes that a bit, whether the new guy in is via trade or a guy getting called up.
And yes.. it's a sell low. He should have been two off-seasons ago, and then again this last off-season. But there's nothing you can do about that now.
Should Benning be the guy to make any moves though? Maybe the only change should be getting a new President and GM, like what the Pen’s are now doing? Get new leadership in now, and let them evaluate the situation, and make changes as they see best.
Boston is not trading for Virtanen.A Boston article suggested a Virtanen ~ DeBrusk trade.
Would love for that to happen.