BaseballCoach
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2006
- 20,753
- 9,113
Suzuki is exempt. Can protect Lehkonen.Weber
Petry
Edmundson
Suzuki
Kotkaniemi
Gallagher
Anderson
Toffoli
Danault
Evans
Suzuki is exempt. Can protect Lehkonen.Weber
Petry
Edmundson
Suzuki
Kotkaniemi
Gallagher
Anderson
Toffoli
Danault
Evans
Makes 0 sense. Even if MB had enough faith in Seattle's GM to not take a specific player, he'd protect Weber and task Seattle not to take Chariot, not the other way around.I don't agree. There is such a thing as "talking". MB TALKs to Seattle and agrees they will not be taking Weber.
Bergevin then talks to Weber and explains that he has arranged for them to take someone else, because Chiarot is being protected.
Weber gets to keep his partner and minute eater, and knows that the GM made sure he was staying wsith the club.
I don't buy this feelings stuff.Makes 0 sense. Even if MB had enough faith in Seattle's GM to not take a specific player, he'd protect Weber and task Seattle not to take Chariot, not the other way around.
Pretty sure Weber would rather lose Chariot than end up on an expansion team, yes.I don't buy this feelings stuff.
Weber is a man mountain, not a fragile ego. Do you think he is going to be saying to Marc Bergevin, "thanks for losing my defence partner, good job! Don't worry, Dom will just play three of us on D next year."
He is not ending up on Seattle!Pretty sure Weber would rather lose Chariot than end up on an expansion team, yes.
I would protect:
Price
Weber, Petry, Edmundson, Chiarot
Kotkaniemi, Gallagher, Toffoli, Anderson
Probably lose Evans or Lehkonen or Allen, but no matter what you lose one pretty good player.
Do you guys think it's possible Bergevin trades the pick to Seattle in exchange of drafting Drouin?
Do you guys think it's possible Bergevin trades the pick to Seattle in exchange of drafting Drouin?
Well, with the 3,5 milions we would open, I don't think we will be able to draft someone better than him for the 1st pair, so I would probably prefer to keep him, even if he is far from ideal on the 1st pair. I would probably go 4-4-1 and let Seattle take someone like Lehkonen ou Evans (Or maybe Allen, which I would prefer not)....so would we rather risk losing Chiarot to Seattle or keep him on our Top Pairing??...those are pretty much the choices...
If habs don't protect droiun and seattle is interested on him so do they need exactly tell to Seattle droiun health situation or can they just shut up and tell nothing?
It's not that hard to get a decent backup goaltender at $2.75M. We used to have a hard time at near minimum.Well, with the 3,5 milions we would open, I don't think we will be able to draft someone better than him for the 1st pair, so I would probably prefer to keep him, even if he is far from ideal on the 1st pair. I would probably go 4-4-1 and let Seattle take someone like Lehkonen ou Evans (Or maybe Allen, which I would prefer not).
The easier way to protect the TOP4 is to protect 4DI feel like MB will make Seattle an offer to take Drouin......could be pick(s) and/or prospect(s) to sweeten the deal but MB will definitely want his top 4 D back and he really needs to clear Drouin's cap hit.
Makes 0 sense. Even if MB had enough faith in Seattle's GM to not take a specific player, he'd protect Weber and task Seattle not to take Chariot, not the other way around.
That is why I would not pay them to not select him, but I would still prefer them to take Evans or Lehkonen. Not that I would be thrilled to lose them, but I think they are easier to replaceIt's not that hard to get a decent backup goaltender at $2.75M. We used to have a hard time at near minimum.
I don't agree. Evans and Lehkonen are both young enough that there is more upside to them, especially Evans at his low salary. And Lehkonen is one of the best penalty killers in the entire league. Not so easy to replace that high level specific skill, not to mention his overall adaptability.That is why I would not pay them to not select him, but I would still prefer them to take Evans or Lehkonen. Not that I would be thrilled to lose them, but I think they are easier to replace
Who will want Weber and is contract? How much would another team be willing to pay for Chariot at 50%. I agree that it probably won’t happen but Chariot is young cheap and playing better he is just a more valuable asset. If you aren’t willing to leave Weber unprotected you are negotiating against your self raising the price to keep player you need to protected…
I hope not. Leaving Drouin on LTIR is better than this.