spacemanatee
Registered User
- May 18, 2014
- 5,843
- 24
He is? That's news to us. Not one single issue in the locker room his 2 full years here that he has been a Sabre. Teammates actually have praised him and love having him. People need to stop going off of what he was in Winnipeg. And it's quite clear that Kane wasn't the only problem there. They got rid of him and they are still a disfunctional underachieving team even though people made it seem he was the root of all their problems.
Not really. It's not even a full million dollar raise. That's actually a good deal considering Okposo, Backes, Lucic, Ladd and Ericsson all got 6 mil per this year and Kane is several years younger then even the youngest one of that group. He said only 25 and will be turning 27 2 months prior to the season of his next deal. That's actually a real good value for us. Kane is a much better value then any of those guys.
Not really. It's not even a full million dollar raise. That's actually a good deal considering Okposo, Backes, Lucic, Ladd and Ericsson all got 6 mil per this year and Kane is several years younger then even the youngest one of that group. He said only 25 and will be turning 27 2 months prior to the season of his next deal. That's actually a real good value for us. Kane is a much better value then any of those guys.
Six years is a long time for a guy who gets banged up so often, not to mention the off ice risk. Less term would be much better.
He is? That's news to us. Not one single issue in the locker room his 2 full years here that he has been a Sabre. Teammates actually have praised him and love having him. People need to stop going off of what he was in Winnipeg. And it's quite clear that Kane wasn't the only problem there. They got rid of him and they are still a disfunctional underachieving team even though people made it seem he was the root of all their problems.
Not really. It's not even a full million dollar raise. That's actually a good deal considering Okposo, Backes, Lucic, Ladd and Ericsson all got 6 mil per this year and Kane is several years younger then even the youngest one of that group. He said only 25 and will be turning 27 2 months prior to the season of his next deal. That's actually a real good value for us. Kane is a much better value then any of those guys.
I never said he was the root of all the Jets problems. But he has a horrible reputation in his hometown and for good reason. Unfortunetly I cannot expand on that point due to site rules.
I believe it. We also have a hometown boy named Kane and the stories about him are also not allowed here, and they would shock many, the fact is if he can comparmentalize the off ice issues and keep them where they originated/belong which is off the ice then that's all I care about. Plenty of good NHLers past and present have dark sides/bad rep/horror stories about them, if they keep it away from the rink and perform then I don't care. All I know is that he's one of the best power forwards in the game and there are very few of them in the league. Very few players bring as a complete a game as Kane. Only thing that he doesn't bring is face offs with him being a winger.
He brings it almost every where else. He plays well in his own end, he's one of the most physical players in the league, he can fight and hold his own against almost anyone, he has elite speed he is a top tier forechecker and has had positive possession #s his whole career and he can score 25 goals (almost all of them at ES). And he's only 25. Kane has 6x as many ES goals then PP goals. That right there is worth the money. If a guy is scoring 20+ ES goals a year that's extremely valuable. He's 25, he can literally fit in any team. He can step right into a playoff contender, he can play on a team that is in the mix for a playoff spot/a year away and he's young enough that he can fit in on a rebuilding team who is 2-3 years off. He turns 26 late this summer and will be 26 throughout the whole 2017-2018 NHL season. He has far more value in real life then he does on Hfboards
Kane @ 50% 2017 2nd for Montour and Ritchie....
How is lehner doing for you? I think a big trade between Pitt and Buff could help out both teams. But if Buff is set with lehner then it's an obvious no
MAF+Pouliot+Sprong+Fehr(cap)+1st
For
Kane+Kulikov+Lehner
Pens solve the Murray situation, wing/D replacement for our mass amounts of injuries right now
Buff gets good futures and a good goalie
LMAO only buffalo fans are saying its a fair offer
People need to stop going off of what he was in Winnipeg. And it's quite clear that Kane wasn't the only problem there. They got rid of him and they are still a disfunctional underachieving team even though people made it seem he was the root of all their problems.
If I'm Buffalo, I'm trying to sell high on him before he potentially does some other stupid thing that brings his rep and future in the league into question.
While I wouldn't mind seeing Kane in a Pens uni I don't want to give up what it would cost to possibly get him. Kane is a players who fills the state sheet in all categories and is a ***** to play against.
I know we are in win now mode and wouldn't mind giving up some picks but I don't want to see sprong go in the process which would most likely need to be in the equation
What would sabres realistically want from the habs for Kane?
One poster who loves to write multi paragraphs who tries to pump up Kane to exaggerated proportions does not speak for other level headed Sabres fans.
That same poster slammed and slammed and slammed Kane and the trade for the majority of the time since the transaction. But now, because um ... pointzzz he's entering almost untouchable territory.
TM will gladly take offers from 29 teams. But the offer has to be fair. Reclaimation projects or quantity doesn't equal quality.
Will the offer hurt? It should, because losing Kane will hurt too.
Can we have Julien?