Jonathan Ericsson Stats | Hockey-Reference.com
Oh yeah, his career just SCREAMS one crazy peak year before a contract. For fun... what one of those 13-15 point seasons was his "one decent year"?
Ericsson was not a star. He wasn't a top tier or great defenseman. He was, however, a guy who reasonably should have been anywhere from #5-7 on a good team's depth chart. He was given a 3x3 and then a 6x4.25 contract because the thought was he'd grow a bit more as an offensive D and be a bona-fide top 4 guy, but he ended up not growing further, due in large part to the massive injury bug he ran into. Ericsson was always slotted above where he should have been. Had the Wings kept a D core like Lidstrom/Rafalski/Stuart/Ericsson, so basically added Suter in 2012 and Fischer hadn't been retired by his heart. Ericsson would be MUCH more fondly remembered.
Say the Wings D in 2012 was Suter, Kronwall, Fischer, Ericsson.