Post-Game Talk: Eastern Conference Finals Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cliffy1814

Registered User
Nov 10, 2011
912
0
For what it's worth, Bovada has

Rangers + 220
Hawks +240
Ducks +240
Lightning +475

Another Sports book has:
Rangers 2/1
Hawks 9/4
Ducks 23/10
Lightning 9/2

Seems to indicate Rangers are fairly prohibitive favorites. Not dsaying I agree with Rangers being twice as likely to advance, but anyone on main boards saying Lightning are more likely to advance is not in agreement with the experts (though I am sure they feel they are one themselves).
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
42,233
52,955
In High Altitoad
Their F depth is tremendous, however I still don't believe in their D. Outside of Hedman, who was all world, I don't see anyone that scares me. Washington's D was far and away better than Tampa's.

Washington's team defense is/was much better than Tampa's.

I don't think the Rangers should try and get into a track meet with this team. Remember how Chicago played the Rangers? That should be their blueprint for this series.

Also the D men better be ready to shoot, because those shots will be there.
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,155
12,564
Elmira NY
Ben Bishop is a very big goalie. The Rangers have had problems scoring goals against going all the way back to his Ottawa days.

As far as this season--the Rangers got hot around their 25th game of the season and never looked back. Before that they were pretty much playing .500 hockey.....and they had some key players out of the lineup. All of the games between TB and us were played towards the beginning of the year and before the Rangers got hot. Not sure I'd read too much off of our games with them this year. OTOH we're going to have to get to Bishop somehow or someway if we're going to have any chance.

How the Rangers top lines two perform against Tampa's top two lines is a key. If the Rangers top two lines can match Tampa's top two production wise I like the rest of our depth at forward better than theirs. Hedman and Stralman are an ace top pairing. Tampa has size on the back line after that in Coburn, Garrison and Sustr. Overall I think our D is better than theirs and Henrik is better than Bishop though again Bishop has not been very giving in the past regarding the Rangers.

We have the home ice advantage and we need to take advantage of it. Hopefully not ****ing around with it like we did against the Caps losing the first game. The Rangers have proven they're a resilient bunch.

The Rangers penalty kill throughout the playoffs has been strong. You're not going to go very far with a crap penalty kill. Rangers power play has been okay. 6 goals in 12 games. Better than what our opponents have gotten from theirs.

I think this series is going to be a little more wide open. If the Rangers continue to defend well--that bodes for the good.
 

Nixo

Registered User
May 12, 2013
73
0
Excited to see how rangers matchup with tampa in the postseason. Cally, boyle, and stralsy will definitely bring it.

on an unrelated note, have you guys seen the last postgame locker room vid? Who is the very short guy next to step? i'm assuming he is a staff member? seen him a couple of times, and i've always been curious who he is.
 

JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
79,351
16,807
Their F depth is tremendous, however I still don't believe in their D. Outside of Hedman, who was all world, I don't see anyone that scares me. Washington's D was far and away better than Tampa's.

Their third and fourth lines haven't done much in terms of scoring. Their top end is insane right now.

Their blueline is solid, and Bishop's a good goalie, but Washington is definitely the better defensive team.
 

Synergy27

F-A-C-G-C-E
Apr 27, 2004
13,350
11,909
Washington, D.C.
I will admit that seeing what the likes of Jay Beagle and Chimera were able to do against Yandle/Boyle when matched up leaves me very nervous to think about what Stamkos can do. That said, they might be better suited to defend less rugged, but more skilled players. Either way though, I feel pretty good about this series. Perhaps I haven't had enough time to build up nerves yet but this feels different (in a good way) to me.
 

pld459666

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
25,877
8,045
Danbury, CT
Their F depth is tremendous, however I still don't believe in their D. Outside of Hedman, who was all world, I don't see anyone that scares me. Washington's D was far and away better than Tampa's.

I think we know first hand how good Stralman can be. He was very good during our run to the finals last season and is going to be a factor in this series for sure.

I think the guys that can get exposed a bit here are Coburn and Carle

The other guys are going to be a handful

Hedman and Stralman need no introduction, Sustr is a big dude that could be an x factor. Garrison has a monster shot.

All in all, I think the Lightning D is more mobile than the Caps D and that plays to their forwards strengths
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
42,233
52,955
In High Altitoad
Sustr has been brutal for Tampa.

Hmmm.. i think there's a line on that Ducks team that's doing pretty decent with those one guys who wear 15 and 10. But maybe that's just me :dunno:

Even so, the Johnson line is excellent.

I think the Bolts are overrated as hell on this site but that line is legit.
 

JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
79,351
16,807
Hmmm.. i think there's a line on that Ducks team that's doing pretty decent with those one guys who wear 15 and 10. But maybe that's just me :dunno:

What about that line is objectively better than Tampa's line? Arguable, but it's far from being objective fact.
 

217 Forever

Registered User
Sep 15, 2014
2,025
99
For what it's worth, Bovada has

Rangers + 220
Hawks +240
Ducks +240
Lightning +475

Another Sports book has:
Rangers 2/1
Hawks 9/4
Ducks 23/10
Lightning 9/2

Seems to indicate Rangers are fairly prohibitive favorites. Not dsaying I agree with Rangers being twice as likely to advance, but anyone on main boards saying Lightning are more likely to advance is not in agreement with the experts (though I am sure they feel they are one themselves).
You are looking at odds to win the cup. The Rangers are surprisingly big favorites to win the conference, but would be underdogs in the finals. They only look like the favorite now because Vegas can't decide who is winning the other series.
 

217 Forever

Registered User
Sep 15, 2014
2,025
99
Sustr has been brutal for Tampa.



Even so, the Johnson line is excellent.

I think the Bolts are overrated as hell on this site but that line is legit.

Tampa is so young they are hard to figure out. They are as talented or more so than any team left, but are they "ready" to win yet?
 

Khelvan

Registered User
Apr 5, 2002
1,750
81
Oakland, CA
Re-watching the OT...the "OMIGOD THE CAPS DOMINATED THE 1st 5 MINUTES" line of thinking is vastly overblown. The Caps had two chances of extended pressure of about a minute each. The Caps missed the net a lot, or had shots blocked.
It has been overblown because fans were in danger of cardiac arrest. The game was in general a pretty close one.
 

Glen Sathers Cigar

Sather 4 Ever
Feb 4, 2013
16,581
20,338
New York
McDonagh and Girardi glued to Johnson's line.

Staal glued to Stamkos.



BTW, we should probably tone down the hyperbole when complaining about our own players a little bit. Some Tampa fans on the mainboard legitimately think Girardi is a terrible defenseman and not on Jason Garrison's level.

I just find that criticism funny because Danny G has been fantastic for mostly the whole playoffs.
 

machphantom

Registered User
Oct 22, 2011
711
176
One thing we do have to worry about, and an aspect where Bishop is undoubtedly better than Hank is his stick handling. If we try and dump the puck in, Bishop will coral it and push it off to one of his D men. Can't afford to make some of our egregious TOs we had against the Caps either.
 

Levitate

Registered User
Jul 29, 2004
31,083
7,940
Rangers actually did alright against Bishop the last couple of games against him but couldn't keep the puck out of their own net, which is why they lost. If he can sit there and just be square to the shots he sees then he's tough to beat. Need to get some screens and puck movement to get him to open up some holes

I recall hearing that Garrison really hasn't been playing that well but his shot is obviously a weapon. Coburn might be doing better now that he's not matched up against every teams top line, but we've seen enough of him in Philly that I can't say I'm really "scared" of him. Carle and Sustr, eh.

The guys to worry about are Hedman and Stralman and beyond that the Lightning are solid but the Rangers secondary scoring lines are going to need to get something going against the bottom 4 of the Lightning.

Preventing speed through the neutral zone and rushes by Tampa will be a huge part of potentially winning this series
 

Riche16

McCready guitar god
Aug 13, 2008
12,859
8,055
The Dreaded Middle
Tickets down here evaporated so quick.

Fortunately, my friend who is a Rangers/Lightning fan, and who has season tickets for TB, has an extra pair for each Lightning home game that I'm buying from him!

So stoked about it. This is going to be a really fun and very fast series. It's going to be as painful to endure as the Caps series was. Hopefully we'll come out on top.

They really did. I'll be there Wednesday night tho! :yo:
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
42,233
52,955
In High Altitoad
maybe. Bishops a very good goalie. Hes not as good as Henrik...but hes being a bit underrated here.

Bishop had a .916 save percentage this season, which is about league average.


Hes not very good by any means. Subban's comments about him sitting on a horseshoe were laughable considering that his goalie sat on an even bigger one during the Bruins series last year, but he wasn't wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad