Baksfamous112
Registered User
- Jul 21, 2016
- 7,543
- 4,601
Yah but he showed he could do it, KK hasn't, how are you not getting this?
But Mackinnon showed it at 22/23, KK is 20.. don’t you get this?
Yah but he showed he could do it, KK hasn't, how are you not getting this?
But Mackinnon showed it at 22/23, KK is 20.. don’t you get this?
Mackinnon showed it at 18 bud, pay attention, it's not that hard.
He showed high end 2C stats at 18 then regressed for 3 straight seasons. Get your own fact straight
no he didn't lmao, he was getting MURDERED online everywhere for 3 years.Mackinnon showed it at 18 bud, pay attention, it's not that hard.
no he didn't lmao, he was getting MURDERED online everywhere for 3 years.
full stop.
habs fans get it . he may be a disappointment to you but we're still fine with letting him develop. at least until he hits 24 or 25 . a bit more confidence, muscle , speed and we could still have a gem . not sure why you get your panties in a knot over his performance. we're happy keeping himYah but he showed he could do it, KK hasn't, how are you not getting this?
habs fans get it . he may be a disappointment to you but we're still fine with letting him develop. at least until he hits 24 or 25 . a bit more confidence, muscle , speed and we could still have a gem . not sure why you get your panties in a knot over his performance. we're happy keeping him
If Quinn Hughes 129 games is an indicator of potential, he will be a one dimensional dman who is awful defensively.It's assuming that his first 171 games are a decent indicator of his potential, which to me is a 3C maybe 2C down the road.
If Quinn Hughes 129 games is an indicator of potential, he will be a one dimensional dman who is awful defensively.
probably shouldn’t label a 20 year old player based on his ELC stats…
He was actually pretty good his first year set the record for rookie points by a dman , had a sophomore slump for sure in his second, JK hasn't done anything so impressive.
Horrible comparison, nice try though,
Yes Larkin had a down statistical year on a very bad rebuilding Detroit team with a weird shortened schedule, but Larkin's D+4 season he went for 63 pts - this season Suzuki's D+4 year he paced for 60 over 82. That season the Red Wings had a .445 pt% vs the Habs .527 pt% - meaning Suzuki is producing on a far better team. Larkin gets more TOI than Suzuki, gets more PK time, wins faceoffs at almost 53% rate.None of that makes Suzuki+ a realistic value for Larkin though. The thread title is "value of" and the OP asks for a trade that makes sense for both sides. We can't just magically say Jeff Petry would return Seider+ because he is extremely important to us and is our only PMD.
I haven't made it to the end of the thread yet but I haven't seen a single Detroit fan seriously propose Romanov + Suzuki. I see the Suzuki love is strong in Montreal.More like 4 years ago and for a brief moment. He’s been unreal since kickstarting this retool
I think he’s trolling in the same way Wings fans are trolling saying it would take Suzuki and Romanov to get Larkin.
Yes Larkin had a down statistical year on a very bad rebuilding Detroit team with a weird shortened schedule, but Larkin's D+4 season he went for 63 pts - this season Suzuki's D+4 year he paced for 60 over 82. That season the Red Wings had a .445 pt% vs the Habs .527 pt% - meaning Suzuki is producing on a far better team. Larkin gets more TOI than Suzuki, gets more PK time, wins faceoffs at almost 53% rate.
This isn't a slag on Suzuki, he is a very good and exciting young player, but you asked why it might be realistic so there are some reasons why a 25 year old with a proven track record of producing in all facets of the game might be more valuable than a young guy with loads of potential who might not have as complete of a game just yet.
Kid got bullied over and over again against Montreal all year so much that he even got benched against us. He was directly responsible for at least 8 GA against us this year but hey.. at least he put up assists on the powerplay