Before we impart sainthood on him.
he is 22, will be 23 in 9 days. While young in life's sense, it is middle age in the modern game.
23 points in 40 games..translates to 47 points in 82 games. That would have ranked him in the 120-130 zone in the 18/19 season. (Which is where he is this year).
his plus/minus is -14..on a very weak team, so he can be forgiven
his last 15 games (March 4 to Feb 7th): 5 points, 3 goals, (-)9 +/-. Extrapolate those numbers and it does not look pretty!
While his productivity has improved this season, it is only marginally better than his 18/19 and 20/21 seasons.
These "young Sens" are regressing in the second half of a shortened season. The team's loses are "prettier", far less 7-1 blow outs, but there are just as many as in the first 20 games. And the offensive productivity for many of the young guys has dipped...Norris aside.
Let me explain the math on this.If you go bridge on guys you identify as core you wind up paying high dollars for their declining years. Let’s use Batherson as an example. You sign him for 3 years at 3M which is easily market value. If he becomes a 60-65 point player he will need over 7M until he is 34. Basically bridging a player forces a trade or bad value contract if the player progresses normally. I like identifying core piece and locking them up until they are 29-30 years old.
Let me explain the math on this.
If you sign a prospect like Drake to a long term deal, it's like flipping a coin.
If it comes up heads, you win a free sandwich.
If it comes up tails, someone shoots your mom in the face.
Disagree on Dadanov 3 year term was nice and 5M AAV is fine as well. Some fans seem to not get the current salaries players get. Getting a 60 point scorer will cost well over 6M.I would take a risk and sign him long-term. You need to pay your stars like Chabot, Tkachuk, and Stutzle - gotta get some bargains on your important but not star players like Norris, Batherson, Zub. It can always blow up but at some point you have to make calculated risks - these are better investments than guys like Tierney, Zaitsev, Dadonov, Murray etc. If they pan out it will go a long way in helping us contend.
I certainly hope you are right and a switch turns on..there are 4-5 guys that had better hit that switch at the same time. Tkachuk ...this will be season 3 of nearly identical stats. ~ 45-48 points, not exactly Hart trophy candidacy!!The basic reality is this is the first season we've relied primarily on kids as the core players of this club. Last season, we had guys like Pageau, Ennis and Namestnikov in our top 6. This season, they've been replaced by kids like Batherson(22), Stutzle(19), and Norris(20).
The fact of the matter is, kids are always going to be inconsistent and go though deeper cold streaks. It's been a fact since the beginning of hockey. In the grander scheme of the rebuild, it's absolutely not troubling that they've gone cold the last few weeks. That's why we have vets like Brown, Dadonov, and Anisimov who have picked up some of the slack these last few weeks.
Disagree on Dadanov 3 year term was nice and 5M AAV is fine as well. Some fans seem to not get the current salaries players get. Getting a 60 point scorer will cost well over 6M.
Would have been the smart thing to do imoNot really concerned about Dadonov per say, just would have preferred to spend the money on a D over a forward if given the choice.
Disagree on Dadanov 3 year term was nice and 5M AAV is fine as well. Some fans seem to not get the current salaries players get. Getting a 60 point scorer will cost well over 6M.
Just look at Toronto. One kids gets a big check, then they all think they deserve big checks (and get them)....and now they fold as soon as the playoffs hit and the game gets a lot harder. Giving the kids everything too easily never seems to work.
.
I think everybody knows White isn't a valid comparable.Just look at Ottawa - we have the Chabot at $8 and White and $4.75 benchmarks set... all these guys like Bath are going to see themselves at or in between those goal posts.
Daddy is currently tied for the team scoring lead. 5 million for that ain’t badDisagree on Dadanov 3 year term was nice and 5M AAV is fine as well. Some fans seem to not get the current salaries players get. Getting a 60 point scorer will cost well over 6M.
I think everybody knows White isn't a valid comparable.
No he isn't. Batherson, Tkachuk and Brown all have 1 more goal than him, he is also on a 30 pts pace which is pretty terrible...Daddy is currently tied for the team scoring lead. 5 million for that ain’t bad
Okay. When he scored last it seems that put him in the lead. But either way. Our elite young core is out scoring him (expected). Brown is having a great year.No he isn't. Batherson, Tkachuk and Brown all have 1 more goal than him, he is also on a 30 pts pace which is pretty terrible...
Okay. When he scored last it seems that put him in the lead. But either way. Our elite young core is out scoring him (expected). Brown is having a great year.
Those goals and points go up as every one else’s goals and points go up. If he can always be close behind tkatchuk and batherson in goals I think it’s decent
Half of them are rookies or close enough, I think it's fair to assume what we are building towards and what we have this season are not the same thing.