prizminferno
Registered User
- Feb 14, 2019
- 2,573
- 1,831
Would they bench Backes longterm?
still beating him though and Johansson has 26 points..though again comparing an aging worn out power forward vs an oft injured defensive forward is moot. Neither are providing enough boost
and brought a cup to Boston and another finals. What's Don accomplished? 1 roundwe had one and he got fired after trading away Seguin & Boychuk.
I know - and they cleared out a ton of picks too. You got to respect them saying f*** the future were all in for today.lottery team next year
Simmonds has more points than Johansson this year. Not to say I want either of them, but lets not make Johansson out to be some star player.
He is an average NHLer at best.
right...still the same point thoughJohansson has 27 points
no he is average when healthy. There is nothing I see from this guy that is worth what they paid forFirst of all, I never said he was a star player. I simply said he is better than Simmonds and he is hands down. Simmonds at this point in his career has become a one-zone player.Johansson plays all three and at an above average level when healthy.
still beating him though and Johansson has 26 points..though again comparing an aging worn out power forward vs an oft injured defensive forward is moot. Neither are providing enough boost
no he is average when healthy. There is nothing I see from this guy that is worth what they paid for
Johansson has 27
Marcus Johansson (b.1990) Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com
Do you not think that Johansson is an upgrade over what we've been rolling out on the wings? Whether he floats up to the 2nd line until Pasta comes back or is on the third with Coyle, I think secondary scoring as well as playing ability have been given a good upgrade with him and Coyle.
put it this way his game doesnt stand out enough really for any comparison I can think of. Just a mostly defensive guy with good speed, decent hands low offensive IQCurious who would you compare him too on the current Bruins or anyone-else around the league?
No I dont. Hope I am wrong, but the only times he was productive was on a stacked Washington team. Is he better than what they had on the third line yes! Is the presuure off the first line for driving offense No!
I don't know what to tell you then, other than your missing the boat on what it takes to win and Johansson is a player who will help the Bruins do just that.put it this way his game doesnt stand out enough really for any comparison I can think of. Just a mostly defensive guy with good speed, decent hands low offensive IQ
I don't know what to tell you then, other than your missing the boat on what it takes to win and Johansson is a player who will help the Bruins do just that.
An over payment??
Not to sure about that . A second pick and a late one at that, but he still could develop into a nice pro in three, four years down the road but after the second round its pretty much a crap shoot when your drafting kids at such a young age. and the second pick may never play in the NHL at all.
Since you don't know enough about Johansson to compare him to anyone. who would of you preferred? And if you say Stone or Duchene, you need to go and find your other paddle because Dorion wasn't trading either of those guys to the Bruins without a massive over-payment.
You basically proved my point at the end. You are banking on Henien and hope Pasta has no affects from surgery. Those are BIG ifs. You know they will target Pasta’s hand in the playoffs and Henien has started to slow down after the initial high being on the first line.Secondary scoring ( especially Krejci line ) has seen a big uptic in production of late. I don't think the 1st line has as much pressure to score as they had to start the season. Krejci is pacing near 70 points; DeBrusk 25ish goals.
The biggest need was to revamp that third line with pros who can play the game. JFK was a mixed bag. Frederic could not produce or help generate scoring chances. Heinen was lost. Backes was more down in his play than up. It was so bad, the third line has been getting less minutes than the fourth line.
I don't think the Bruins need Johnassson or Coyle to be better than they've been. I think if they play their game and do what they normally do, our third line and secondary scoring gets a very nice upgrade.
A lot of this does bank on Heinen's improved play to continue and for Pasta to come back and not be hindered by the thumb. We'll see how all this plays out.
You basically proved my point at the end. You are banking on Henien and hope Pasta has no affects from surgery. Those are BIG ifs. You know they will target Pasta’s hand in the playoffs and Henien has started to slow down after the initial high being on the first line.
I hope they continue, but also pretty leery to gloss over the concern.
I mean sure, 6m to Backes is way better
What if I told you Backes + Moore = Stone money?
They did not upgrade scoring, they just made the third line a non black hole by adding some defensive forwards. So we have two prevent lines 1 great line and a below average second line. Again probably gets by round 1 but that’s about it.We all wanted Stone, but it simply was not realistic. And how would we have dealt with his 9.5 contract next year?
We focused on upgrading secondary scoring and the third line and they did a good job.
Let`s ask their fans for the next few years if they respect it? They had 2 options, ship out Bobrovski and Panarin and blow it up or thumb their noses at both and tell em` to settle in cuz they aren`t going anywhere, go all in and push all chips into the middle.I know - and they cleared out a ton of picks too. You got to respect them saying **** the future were all in for today.
They did not upgrade scoring, they just made the third line a non black hole by adding some defensive forwards. So we have two prevent lines 1 great line and a below average second line. Again probably gets by round 1 but that’s about it.
Why does anybody care how much Stone makes vs. Bergeron or Marchand? Those guys signed those deals with their eyes open. You telling me you're okay with your team getting a great deal on players only to use the saved money for nothing? That's good asset management? I'd have signed Stone for that deal.
And let's not forget David Backes got a $6M/5yr deal 3 years ago. Something tells me the Bruins players would be much happier with a top 20 NHL talent making them a Cup contender but costing $9M/year than a guy making $6M/year who should be a healthy scratch.
They didn`t upgrade their 3rd line scoring? Please, let`s say the 3rd was/is Frederic/Backes/Nordy/JFK/Cave all combined= 29ptsThey did not upgrade scoring, they just made the third line a non black hole by adding some defensive forwards. So we have two prevent lines 1 great line and a below average second line. Again probably gets by round 1 but that’s about it.
How do those two guys added not upgrade scoring? Coyle and MoJo are 7th and 8th in points respectively. Making the third line "a non black hole" is, by definition, upgrading the scoring.