You can benchmark yourself against whomever you want. But others get to say it's a garbage comp in return, no?
Like I said at the very start of my involvement in this, it's not about how they've done when compared to others. It's about how this team and the cap, and the construction of the roster is under this front office. And at best you can say it's lacking. Like I also said from my interjection, this is and has been a one line team during Sweeney's entire tenure. It's a top line and then a bunch of bottom six guys for the most part, which is why they continually get bounced in the first round. Does that sound like a good job being done? I mean I get that it does to Jacobs since they get a series of playoff gate revenue, but as fans, does it feel like the current group has done enough in all facets of the job to be happy and satisfied or does it feel more like the Sinden days of "we qualified for the playoffs 27 consecutive years" kind of deal? I know which one it feels like to me. I lived through the first version of Sinden and his bullshit. I have very little interest in seeing Harry 2.0 touting the same f***ing nonsense as proof he's doing a good job. He's not. This roster is mostly low grade dog food with a rapidly aging top line.