Cap increases due to escalator... but escrow takes back 18% of the overage
So really no miricle necessary to kill cap growth... just need players to say no more using our money to create fake cap projections
You keep repeating this stuff despite being repeatedly corrected, but all it does is to show that you do not know how the cap or escalator work. If this is the case why should anyone take your cap projections seriously.
If the escalator is the same from year to year, which it almost always has been, the cap rises because revenue rises. The escalator is applied after the current year preliminary revenue totals are tallied so its impact is not compounded. It's purpose is to build in an estimate for revenue increases year to year not to artificially raise the cap. There are no "fake revenue projections".
If you don't believe me wander over to the Business Board and ask someone like mouser or kdb if the cap has only gone up over the years because of the escalator. Tell them I sent you and I am sure they will straighten us out. If either agrees with you then I will retract my claim and publically apologize. It would be nice if you would do the same if it turns out that I am correct but of course that is up to you.
As for escrow as I have again explained this is because teams spend to close to the cap and that the player's share is based on the midpoint with the cap set off the midpoint by formula.
Final escrow this year should be less for two reasons. The first is that the presence of Vegas has opened up cap space for many teams. We could see about 2-3M more space on average than in the past that in itself could reduce escrow by up to about 5%.
The second reason is the reduction in the escalator from 5% to 1.35%. Combine these two and you likely cut escrow in half.
Then you have the rising $CDN which bumps up the next year's revenue on which the final escrow calculation is based.
Bottom line the only relevance to my post that the escalator has is the possibility that the NHLPA changes it again next year. But at the very most this could be a 1.35% draw on the cap and I already included this in my calculations.
90% of this debate is about the cap yet the vast majority have not actually taken the time to find out what sort of shape the Oilers really are in. Since none of us has a crystal ball the best we could do is speculation, but at least that speculation can be based on a correct understanding of the rules of the game and of the team's actually circumstances!
And as a bone I will say that I checked the previous year's $CDN and the late rise actually took it to par with the previous year so you can ignore my $300K comment in the post you quoted as the currency impact last year was minimal.