jrgtml67
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2011
- 5,457
- 945
"Hollow Man," has torn up the O this year, 54pts in 44 games. Durzi has 27 in 28. My belief is a huge yes, and Sandin is the obvious other reason. Thoughts?
"Hollow Man," has torn up the O this year, 54pts in 44 games. Durzi has 27 in 28. My belief is a huge yes, and Sandin is the obvious other reason. Thoughts?
Durzi was a C level prospect.
"Hollow Man," has torn up the O this year, 54pts in 44 games. Durzi has 27 in 28. My belief is a huge yes, and Sandin is the obvious other reason. Thoughts?
I wasn't particularly enamored with either pick at the time, I certainly don't think one guy performing better than the other makes the other any more expendable either
I'm still pretty meh about both of them if I'm being honest, your beating up on kids, great, let's see what you can do against men then I may get a bit more interested
"Hollow Man," has torn up the O this year, 54pts in 44 games. Durzi has 27 in 28. My belief is a huge yes, and Sandin is the obvious other reason. Thoughts?
Um a point a game D in OHL isnt C level. My point is Hollow has made a big step this yr and playing better then Durzi.
Durzi was a C level prospect.
Think Grundstrom or the 1st were more of the headlining piece to the trade.
And Grundy is just ok. Just OK. We stole Muzzy
Priceless do you even watch any of the games they play? That is a serious question.I wasn't particularly enamored with either pick at the time, I certainly don't think one guy performing better than the other makes the other any more expendable either
I'm still pretty meh about both of them if I'm being honest, your beating up on kids, great, let's see what you can do against men then I may get a bit more interested
Priceless do you even watch any of the games they play? That is a serious question.