ANDersen has all those wins because he's in net when the leafs score a lot of goals.
It's called a narrative, which you have provided.
The beauty about narratives, there could be competing narratives.
Narratives could be the result of religious conviction, or empirical data. They can also be black and white, or ambiguous.
To make a long story short, I don't think there is too much deficiency with the current team, compared to other Leafs teams. I think there is more balance too, everywhere in the roster.
Still there are weak spots, but I do not believe Andersen is one of them. If he was, he would not have won 10 games, and counting.
Also, look beyond that GAA and sv% stat, because that should not correlate to 2nd in the league with 10 wins for the goalie.
Head to head, who did Andersen beat this year?
How many games did Andersen blow on his own?
The second question is a good one because, if one replies along the lines he could of played better, that's bs because that is just concerning ourselves with style points. How many games did Andersen blow on his own? Did he give his team a chance to win in his games, or not? How many games?
That is still a little subjective, but by definition, if the Leafs win, and Andersen won the game, logically that means Andersen gave the team a chance to win, because they won.
Could he have played better? Sure, but he won the game. He gave the team a chance to win! Isn't that the point?
Go Leafs Go!