Hutton 26:49 TOI
Gudbranson had a horrendous game from what I saw. I think the only hope here is a new GM that will come in and clean a lot of these players out. Doubt Benning will move these guys and admit his error.
Gaunce needs a fight a week to stay in the line up, imo.
But Pierre McGuire said Gudbranson was a MONSTER.
Granlund and Sutter losing out 5on5 again?
Granlund hasn't been a positive player in any of his past 20 games. minus player in last 6 and 8/10.
Can they match Edlers epic -39 from a couple years back tho?Gudbranson, Granlund, and Sutter all look to be in contention for the green jacket this year at -13, -12, and -12 respectively. Add Hutton and his -11, and you have 4 Canucks among the 7 worst +/- in the league.
Who cares? One of them was 5 on 3
The whole Sedin thing on this thread started when a poster said they have not always shown enough pushback and got ganged up on by all the sensitive Sedin defenders.
If people cannot admit the Sedins did not show enough pushback in the Cup Finals than they have lost objectivity. To be fair they are not as soft as some call them out for but they have also not always showed enough pushback either.
No fan should be blamed because they are ready for change after 16 years of the same thing and want bigger, faster and grittier players in the top 6. They do exist.
Intresting henrik mentioned 2-3 times that the d aren't getting involved enough and said after the game," sitting back too much.. From the backend all the way up"
Wow Gudbranson looks alright in sheltered/limited minutes, but he turns into a tire fire when he's relied on to be more than a depth guy.
Intresting henrik mentioned 2-3 times that the d aren't getting involved enough and said after the game," sitting back too much.. From the backend all the way up"
Intresting henrik mentioned 2-3 times that the d aren't getting involved enough and said after the game," sitting back too much.. From the backend all the way up"
Wow Gudbranson looks alright in sheltered/limited minutes, but he turns into a tire fire when he's relied on to be more than a depth guy.
Not necessarily the first time Hankie has mentioned this, though..
To me, it's a small jab - at more than one person and/or coach - to play less scared and defensive, and open it up a bit.
Heck, what do we have to lose?
Intresting henrik mentioned 2-3 times that the d aren't getting involved enough and said after the game," sitting back too much.. From the backend all the way up"