Devils 2018-19 team discussion (news and notes) - part Xll

Status
Not open for further replies.

AfroThunder396

[citation needed]
Jan 8, 2006
39,132
23,195
Miami, FL
I don't think Kinkaid is going to provide any more value to the team in terms of on-ice play, so it probably is best to trade him now as opposed to letting him walk for free.

The return will be marginal, but it's still something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smitty426

njdevil26

I hate avocados
Dec 13, 2006
13,789
5,119
Clark, NJ
Sining Panarin and Duchene would be hilarious and amazing.

Hall-Duchene-Panarin
Johansson-Hischier-Palmieri
Wood-Zacha-Bratt
Coleman-Zajac-Whatever

I would say at this point the Devils have cause and motivation to get rid of Schneider's contract somehow creating more cap space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nugg

haak84

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
4,141
2,310
Skinner and Stone: yes.
Panarin: maybe
Karlsson: (+ Severson + Vats on defense?... yikes - better also trade for two Vezina-class goalies)
Duchene - want no part of this clown's problems.

If you get someone like karlsson you need an average stay out home defenseman to balance him out. Could see Mueller or Santini developing to fill in some of the minor holes Karlsson’s game has. He elevates the team’s play too much to be worried about filling in the rest of the team D. His team has the puck possessed for too long that the pressure is reduced. He is a Norris worthy defenseman year in and year out would absolutely improve our D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zajacs Bowl Cut

glenwo2

LINDY RUFF NEEDS VIAGRA!!
Oct 18, 2008
52,062
24,350
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
Sining Panarin and Duchene would be hilarious and amazing.

Hall-Duchene-Panarin
Johansson-Hischier-Palmieri
Wood-Zacha-Bratt
Coleman-Zajac-Whatever

I would say at this point the Devils have cause and motivation to get rid of Schneider's contract somehow creating more cap space.

Why would signing Panarin be "hilarious"?

Is that meant in a good way or in a "This is a stupid signing" way?
 

haak84

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
4,141
2,310
Karlsson similarity scores:
Brian Leetch
Sergei Gonchar
Nicklas Lidstrom

He is turning 29 where most of the above continued to excel until their late 30’s. If I’m Ray I do whatever it takes to sign him. Highly unlikely though.
 

njdevil26

I hate avocados
Dec 13, 2006
13,789
5,119
Clark, NJ
Why would signing Panarin be "hilarious"?

Is that meant in a good way or in a "This is a stupid signing" way?

For the purposes of my post:

Hilarious- Would be amazing... but also will never happen

I mean that in terms of signing both. Panarin and Duchene. I could see one or the other... but these two will arguably be the top of the class and will be sought after by practically every team in the league. I don't know the Devils to be a top destination for free agents... that's at least what recent history shows. Lou always had to overpay to get guys here... and Shero seems to be a bit frugal... for good reasons. I can tell you this, if we consider the Devils and the Rangers to be at similar points in their rebuilds... free agents will choose the Rangers over us. That's a sad reality... but who knows.
 

Hischier and Hughes

“I love to hockey”
Jan 28, 2018
9,408
4,357
I don't think Kinkaid is going to provide any more value to the team in terms of on-ice play, so it probably is best to trade him now as opposed to letting him walk for free.

The return will be marginal, but it's still something.
Agreed, might as well go Flyers style with the carousel of goalies
 

Ripshot 43

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
13,790
10,593
I do think Hall signing long term might actually turn our big name FA woes around a bit. Other big FAs seeing him commit to staying might attract players to want to play with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nugg

billingtons ghost

Registered User
Nov 29, 2010
10,576
6,835
lol @ "yikes"ing Erik Karlsson
woof.
also, if Artemi Panarin told you he wanted to sign with the Devils you'd turn him down? Come on now.


Karlsson could make a good team a championship contender, or he could make a mediocre team plain awful. He can't do it by himself. He needs that Seabrook equivalent anchoring the otherside, otherwise it is a shitshow. We don't have that. For the first part of the season in San Jose - they didn't have it either because they paired him with who they thought was the best guy to support him in Vlasic. Look how that turned out - ruined Vlasic. Now he's got a partner with better wheels and his game has taken off - or you need a goalie who can weather the storm - and we clearly don't have that yet. That is my major (and really only) complaint about bringing him here.

I know you've made a career of 'money and cap and contracts don't matter' in defending Zajac's albatross in the past 5 years or so - but seriously - you can't build teams through just one player with a monster contract. Karlsson is going to demand term and top $$$ - and you had better have the team around him that is near to competing for a championship otherwise... how are we any better than last year's Ottawa in this situation? Taylor Hall instead of Duchene?

Panarin wants to come here - yep, point a game player who is 27. That's all great. But he's another LW that is going to ask for what? 8m aav minimum on a discount deal? Are you REPLACING Hall, or are you really going to trot him out there on the second line next to Zajac, or Zacha. I mean - I get the wonderful idea of Fantasy hockey with infinite cap but don't we have other glaring holes in a number of positions to fill before we go out and get another 5'11 LW scorer? Won't it hurt us elsewhere?

I just think Skinner brings more, and Stone would be arguably a better value on a cheaper contract at 6'4" and would push Palms down to the 2nd line. I think we could do Stone AND resign Hall, and add someone on D instead of just getting Panarin and potentially losing Hall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkauron

Ripshot 43

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
13,790
10,593
Karlsson similarity scores:
Brian Leetch
Sergei Gonchar
Nicklas Lidstrom

He is turning 29 where most of the above continued to excel until their late 30’s. If I’m Ray I do whatever it takes to sign him. Highly unlikely though.

Yikes :sarcasm:
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,963
44,591
PA
Karlsson could make a good team a championship contender, or he could make a mediocre team plain awful. He can't do it by himself. He needs that Seabrook equivalent anchoring the otherside, otherwise it is a ****show. We don't have that. For the first part of the season in San Jose - they didn't have it either because they paired him with who they thought was the best guy to support him in Vlasic. Look how that turned out - ruined Vlasic. Now he's got a partner with better wheels and his game has taken off - or you need a goalie who can weather the storm - and we clearly don't have that yet. That is my major (and really only) complaint about bringing him here.

I know you've made a career of 'money and cap and contracts don't matter' in defending Zajac's albatross in the past 5 years or so - but seriously - you can't build teams through just one player with a monster contract. Karlsson is going to demand term and top $$$ - and you had better have the team around him that is near to competing for a championship otherwise... how are we any better than last year's Ottawa in this situation? Taylor Hall instead of Duchene?

Panarin wants to come here - yep, point a game player who is 27. That's all great. But he's another LW that is going to ask for what? 8m aav? Are you REPLACING Hall, or are you really going to trot him out there on the second line next to Zajac, or Zacha. I mean - I get the wonderful idea of Fantasy hockey with infinite cap but don't we have other glaring holes in a number of positions to fill before we go out and get another 5'11 LW scorer? Won't it hurt us elsewhere?

I just think Skinner brings more, and Stone would be arguably a better value on a cheaper contract at 6'4" and would push Palms down to the 2nd line. I think we could do Stone AND resign Hall, and add someone on D instead of just getting Panarin and potentially losing Hall.

wait do you actually think Marc Methot is good, or? Thats who Karlsson dragged around for YEARS in Ottawa and made him actually look capable.

You wouldn't take Panarin for $8 million/year!? Are you nuts?! He is going to command more than that anyways, but sheesh...

I'm not sure you quite understand our cap space.We could give max contracts to 2 of those guys on my list and still have plenty of room. We could absolutely re-sign Hall and give one of those guys a max contract and still be totally fine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bleedred

Hischier and Hughes

“I love to hockey”
Jan 28, 2018
9,408
4,357
I personally dont want Karlsson just for the sheer fact I want others instead

I wouldnt be upset if we did get him Id just rather Panarin or Skinner
 

billingtons ghost

Registered User
Nov 29, 2010
10,576
6,835
wait do you actually think Marc Methot is good, or? Thats who Karlsson dragged around for YEARS in Ottawa and made him actually look capable.

I'm not sure you quite understand our cap space.We could give max contracts to 2 of those guys on my list and still have plenty of room. We could absolutely re-sign Hall and give one of those guys a max contract and still be totally fine.

No, you're proving my point. Karlsson was a -668867678 player because every time he took a flyer, he fished the puck out of his net. I think every OTT/Devils game I watched for years featured at least two episodes of our guys streaking in 2-on-0 because Karlsson tried for a home run and caught everyone out of position. He's a great player and can do great things and sometimes tries to do too much. We'll see if San Jose gets out of the first round and whether a Karlsson-induced terrible breakdown is the impetus for their exit this year. They are a good enough team (with Jones and their D corps and reliable back-checking forwards) that they can absorb that.

You wouldn't take Panarin for $8 million/year!? Are you nuts?!

I know you have a problem:confused::eek::help: , but I won't answer your garbage like this. I pointed out that he's a luxury - like adding a Kovalchuk-lite in his prime. I don't think you understand how to build a team. Learn how to be civil.

I'm not sure you quite understand our cap space.We could give max contracts to 2 of those guys on my list and still have plenty of room. We could absolutely re-sign Hall and give one of those guys a max contract and still be totally fine.

I'm not sure you can read nor how to build a team. I just outlined that yes, we can sign Hall, and give ONE of those guys a max contract. Are we ready to compete for a cup with Hall and Panarin as our two big (and only) additions? Does that move the needle so much that it is worth jeopardizing resigning Nico, or Zacha if they blow up - or better - going out and getting a decent defenseman, or goaltender? Duchene (whom I despise) probably makes the most sense at making us stronger down the middle going forward. Karlsson certainly makes more sense in adding to our D corps. Stone makes sense because we could probably add two max guys + Stone. Skinner is almost a Panarin equivalent with a ppg, a bit more size, a year younger, and a more complete game and probably better character that might come at the same price or less.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,543
Karlsson or Myers does nothing to address the left side of this D...Obviously if you can add a player the caliber of Karlsson you do it but we need a better Dman on that left side as our #1 priority in my opinion.
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,963
44,591
PA
are we really using plus/minus as an argument in 2019 as if it matters whatsoever?

also, signing Hall plus one of those guys does not jeopardize re-signing Nico whatsoever. We can afford to pay one of those guys JUST with the money coming off the books this offseason from Johansson, Boyle, and Lovejoy (~$10 million). That doesn't even touch the cap space we currently still have available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleedred

Nubmer6

Sleep is a poor substitute for caffeine
Sponsor
Jul 14, 2013
13,743
17,842
The Village
are we really using plus/minus as an argument in 2019 as if it matters whatsoever?

also, signing Hall plus one of those guys does not jeopardize re-signing Nico whatsoever. We can afford to pay one of those guys JUST with the money coming off the books this offseason from Johansson, Boyle, and Lovejoy (~$10 million). That doesn't even touch the cap space we currently still have available.
It's not a completely useless stat. It's just part of the big picture.
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,963
44,591
PA
Ovechkin scored 51 goals one year and was a -35

another year in his career he scored 50 goals and was a +45

wonder how that can be explained? Or maybe plus/minus is a stupid antiquated state?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nugg and Bleedred
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad