Yeah, no. See, here's the issue with your logic. You can easily point to a 4 or 5 game span for Marchand and Pasta (or really anyone on the team) and say they didn't perform all that great during it, but the rest of the season both have been playing at a very high level.
Now to what you did specifically. You pointed to a 5 game span and said Backes was playing well, but when you dig into it, he wasn't. He was just playing better than the bag of **** we call the rest of his season to this point. So that 5 game stretch you pointed to for Backes was literally the best he's been all year, and it was still sub par and not very good. Just better than him doing zero.
I get that you don't want to hear and seem to have an aversion to reality, but in all honesty, Backes has been terrible. Complete fact. Period. End of statement.