Tip is now executive VP of hockey operations as well.
Playfair can kick rocks. If there is ANYTHING positive in all this, Playfair not returning would be just fine.
One thing is clear now is Tip's involvement in personnel decisions. So if we land at 70 points next year, Tip will bet crucified. That is fine, but if we are at 100 points, he should get some much deserved credit, but he won't, not from most of this fan base, and that's too bad.
If Tip gets us into the playoffs with the roster next year after having 100% complete control of the process, then I will gladly eat crow. I'm not afraid to admit when I'm wrong.
But there's nothing that was said or done today that gives me any indication that we're in for a fun, happy time this season.
So if we land at 70 points next year, Tip will bet crucified. That is fine, but if we are at 100 points, he should get some much deserved credit, but he won't, not from most of this fan base, and that's too bad.
Any time a high profile business tries a new strategy (group decisions/analytics/26 year old GM) they get criticized. IA could have shot DM/Tip/the entire coaching staff/Chayka and started over. They could have brought in an experienced assistant as GM/an experienced coach, retreads basically. Instead they are trying something different then anyone else. The usual naysayers don't think it will work, because its new. Maybe it works/maybe it doesn't, too early to tell.
One thing I have learned is that when the public (this fan base in this instance) is so against something, it usually is a good move and works out. Professional gamblers make a living with this thinking.
The same fans that hate Tip/26 year old as GM, will still hate them even if the Coyotes make the playoffs next year. One thing is clear now is Tip's involvement in personnel decisions. So if we land at 70 points next year, Tip will bet crucified. That is fine, but if we are at 100 points, he should get some much deserved credit, but he won't, not from most of this fan base, and that's too bad.
I'm more bothered by Drummond living out his personal fantasy.
Tippett can have all the credit if we get 100pts next season without a doubt. But don't come in here and say he shouldn't be crucified when we get between 70-80 and the kids aren't playing or getting considerable minutes and Vermette is still playing on the PP.
I'm more angry at the Tippett extension for 5 f'ing years than I am with them trying something different with Chayka. I can live withe the Chayka attempt, he might be good. I know what I've got with Tippett and it's boring ass hockey. Dump and chase with a bunch of players who are possession players, but hey, we can only play 1 way.
I actually like Chayka. I dispise Tippet for very obvious reasons that have been explained dozens of times, and I question how some of you can justify his extension and support him after 4 years of disgusting hockey.
One thing's for sure, he's running the boat. If he gets us into playoffs then he'll get my credit. Nothing in his past 4 years has given me any reason to believe that he can do so, however.
I throw the same argument back at you. If we miss the playoffs for the 5th straight year with him calling all of the shots, and he continues to get credit from some of our posters, then that's too bad.
One thing's for sure, he's running the boat. If he gets us into playoffs then he'll get my credit. Nothing in his past 4 years has given me any reason to believe that he can do so, however.
He could trade every prospect in the system and make the playoffs comfortably. DT needs to make the playoffs without altering the trajectory of the franchise and its youth. The best way of doing that would be trades and signings. Shame you just put a rookie with zero experience in the hotseat.
You know we are still in a rebuild, right? I don't expect to be in the playoffs next year, but they could be close. It's the third year I see huge results.
That was your same argument before last year started and DT proved most you guys wrong about playing kids.
There was no one else qualified to be in charge of hockey ops?
Huh? Domi made it impossible not to play him. As for Duke, he was still getting less ice time than he deserved, no matter how well he played. It isn't like we had two average rookies out there. Why would DT get credit for Duke being so productive while not getting the TOI he deserved?
You know we are still in a rebuild, right? I don't expect to be in the playoffs next year, but they could be close. It's the third year I see huge results.