Beef Invictus
Revolutionary Positivity
I didn't know that Myers left the organization.
LOL if you think Hakstol is playing him over MacDonald.
I didn't know that Myers left the organization.
He's played Sanheim and Folin over MacDonald. Point is, if they traded Sanheim or Ghost, they'd need to call up a defenseman, and they have Myers waiting in the wings. I don't think replacing Sanheim or Ghost with Myers is "blowing up the defense," and I think it would be a net benefit to add Nylander. Additionally, Morin will be back at some point this season. The time is ripe to trade a defenseman.LOL if you think Hakstol is playing him over MacDonald.
He's played Sanheim and Folin over MacDonald. Point is, if they traded Sanheim or Ghost, they'd need to call up a defenseman, and they have Myers waiting in the wings. I don't think replacing Sanheim or Ghost with Myers is "blowing up the defense," and I think it would be a net benefit to add Nylander. Additionally, Morin will be back at some point this season. The time is ripe to trade a defenseman.
That's odd considering Hextall has never placed Myers on the Flyers regular season roster yet.
Hextall is the GM. The NHL roster is his decision. If he wants someone on the team he can put him on the team. You really seem to have yourself convinced that Hakstol is to blame for absolutely everything.He would have if Hakstol had wanted him. Hextall doesn't pick the roster, Hakstol does.
Hextall is the GM. The NHL roster is his decision. If he wants someone on the team he can put him on the team. You really seem to have yourself convinced that Hakstol is to blame for absolutely everything.
Hextall is the GM. The NHL roster is his decision. If he wants someone on the team he can put him on the team. You really seem to have yourself convinced that Hakstol is to blame for absolutely everything.
Yeah, ask Sanheim how that worked last year, or Voro this year. He isn't forcing Hakstol to play guys.
You go to truly unbelievable lengths to defend Hakstol and mitigate the blame he gets for his own decisions for someone who claims to not defend him.
You think saying that the GM is in charge of the team’s roster is going “to truly unbelievable lengths to defend Hakstol”? Your mind is warped when it comes to Hak. News flash: He’s not 100% responsible for everything.
I think you're responding to someone I have blocked, but in the interests of fairness - Hak has scratched Mac 12 of the last 14 games.He chose MacDonald over Myers once already.
Absolutely nothing Hakstol has indicated in his tenure says it's worthwhile to assume that he will use Myers over Mac. Like that time when Morin outplayed Mac and Mac was still chosen over him.
I think you're responding to someone I have blocked, but in the interests of fairness - Hak has scratched Mac 12 of the last 14 games.
And yet in the games he has played, he uses AMac as a top 4 Dman.I think you're responding to someone I have blocked, but in the interests of fairness - Hak has scratched Mac 12 of the last 14 games.
Yet he’s still in the NHL and Myers in the minors. So, as it relates to Myers, he’s still choosing Mac regardless of if he’s scratched.
There are 3 coaches in the entire NHL that have longer tenures than Honk, plus a few more hired around the same time.
Someone in the Honk defence force please tell me how he is deserving of being the ~4th longest tenured coach in the league. I would love to hear that argument.
In fact, I would love to hear any argument for keeping him that isn't a cop out answer (ie, no "coaching doesn't matter" answers). Let's hear the reasons he should stay. Or better yet, justify his continued employment using just his accomplishments.