A isn't coming off surgery this year. Back is fixed. He should be fine.Using Z, Dats and Larkin at Center doesn't help Z much. For the longevity of the year its best to have Z on the wing. My guess is if lines struggle me move to. Either way, might as well try the lines above. They make the most sense as long as Sheahan can handle it, although I have my doubts.
Z, Dats, Abby
Nyquist, Larkin, Tats
That's exactly opposite of what has worked for eons. One line teams don't ever win cups.You know the way you create matchup problems? By stacking the **** out of a line. If you spread all of your really good players around, the other team can focus on those really good players and you're left hoping that Riley Sheahan and Teemu Pulkkinen and Luke Glendening are going to be the difference makers.
Whereas, if you stack the top line, you automatically have the matchup problem you want with Henrik Zetterberg, Pavel Datsyuk, and Dylan Larkin being the guys who will make stuff happen. Load the top line to get great matchups for THOSE guys as opposed to hoping that maybe you find one with a third line.
And if the other team stacks its best defensive players to counter that top line, then you have the TSN line facing prime matchups where they should be able to do some damage.
I will never understand this need for balance and uniformity. Utilize good players with good players. Survive the shifts of your bad players. If it doesn't work, you can change it.
I mean, honestly, why are you so beholden to the depth? Haven't they been **** all year? Haven't they been outplayed all season? Why not try something new?
That's exactly opposite of what has worked for ions.
1. Eons. Ions are charged particles.
2. More than one thing can work at a time.
3. Even Babcock would load up when he needed a spark. This team needs a spark.
Just for the sake of Zetterbergs longevity I don't want him playing center.
Remember what happened last year ?
Larkin-Dasyuk-Zetterberg
2 goats and a kid
Using Z, Dats and Larkin at Center doesn't help Z much. For the longevity of the year its best to have Z on the wing. My guess is if lines struggle me move to. Either way, might as well try the lines above. They make the most sense as long as Sheahan can handle it, although I have my doubts.
Z, Dats, Abby
Nyquist, Larkin, Tats
Larkin-Zetterberg-Datsyuk
Tatar-Sheahan-Nyquist
Abdelkader-Athanasiou-Pulkkinen
Miller-Glendening-Helm
You know the way you create matchup problems? By stacking the **** out of a line. If you spread all of your really good players around, the other team can focus on those really good players and you're left hoping that Riley Sheahan and Teemu Pulkkinen and Luke Glendening are going to be the difference makers.
Whereas, if you stack the top line, you automatically have the matchup problem you want with Henrik Zetterberg, Pavel Datsyuk, and Dylan Larkin being the guys who will make stuff happen. Load the top line to get great matchups for THOSE guys as opposed to hoping that maybe you find one with a third line.
And if the other team stacks its best defensive players to counter that top line, then you have the TSN line facing prime matchups where they should be able to do some damage.
I will never understand this need for balance and uniformity. Utilize good players with good players. Survive the shifts of your bad players. If it doesn't work, you can change it.
I mean, honestly, why are you so beholden to the depth? Haven't they been **** all year? Haven't they been outplayed all season? Why not try something new?
Survive the shifts of your bad players??
Sounds like a great game plan!
Well, a line of Z-Dats-Larkin is pretty much loading up for us.Bowman could load up with putting Yzerman, Fedorov and Shanahan together. It was fun. It might get the opposing coach off of his gameplan.
Well, a line of Z-Dats-Larkin is pretty much loading up for us.
Would also be interested in seeing Larkin in that #2C role between Tatar and Nyquist. I think that could be a fun line.
Zetterberg-Datsyuk-Abdelkader
Tatar-Larkin-Nyquist
Sheahan-Athanasiou-Pulkkinen
Miller-Glendening-Helm
Then with Richards back you can send AA down if he isn't tearing it up.
Well, a line of Z-Dats-Larkin is pretty much loading up for us.
Would also be interested in seeing Larkin in that #2C role between Tatar and Nyquist. I think that could be a fun line.
Zetterberg-Datsyuk-Abdelkader
Tatar-Larkin-Nyquist
Sheahan-Athanasiou-Pulkkinen
Miller-Glendening-Helm
Then with Richards back you can send AA down if he isn't tearing it up.
Zetterberg-Datsyuk-Abdelkader
Tatar-Larkin-Nyquist
Sheahan-Athanasiou-Pulkkinen
Miller-Glendening-Helm