Vandalay Industries
Registered User
- Feb 13, 2008
- 622
- 157
Denmark's display is likely the worst defensive performance (and effort) I've ever seen from a national team. How do you define, "soft goals?" There isn't necessarily a consensus as to what is soft and what is not. Denmark provided no net coverage, could barely cover the slot, screened Sogaard, zone exits were horrendous, and cross crease passes were copious. I don't think you realize how difficult it is to be a goaltender when you have to survey every skater. Withal, Denmark hardly played the boards at any point in the tourney. Nearly every opportunity in their end was quality.
So, I guess you need someone to go back, find clips and show you in slowmotion why each of the soft goals were soft goals. I really don't want to spend my time holding your hand through such an exercise, but you might want to take the tour through the goals yourself. I have seen them all several times and I have no doubt a top goalie prospect would have prevented at least 8-10 of the Danish goals against in these games.
A first round draft prospect goalie would not have won the games against Canada, Czech Republic and Switzerland because those games would have turned out lopsided anyway, but a top prospect goalie would have won those games against Kazakhstan instead of letting in 6 goals on 21 shots. Yeremeyev was facing much worse shots and a lot more shots than Søgaard, and Yeremeyev turned out to be the (by far) best goalie in those games.
You are definitely right about the Danish team not being good, but it was mainly the offensive side of the Danish team that was really bad.