about a 20 year player pool means a lot of playersHf just wants everyone in the hall, I swear.
I see people mentioning Olympic contributions. Does that or should it have any bearing on if a player makes the HHOF? Shouldn't it be based on what they did in the NHL and the NHL alone? If Olympic contributions do matter, shouldn't there be a bunch of Russians in the HHOF because of their contributions to hockey?
The reason I ask is I've never actually thought about it from that perspective, I've always thought it was based on ones play in the NHL.
about a 20 year player pool means a lot of players
No Martin Brodeur? No Zdeno Chara? No Malkin? I put all of these players as better players + career than iginla or st. louis
I see people mentioning Olympic contributions. Does that or should it have any bearing on if a player makes the HHOF? Shouldn't it be based on what they did in the NHL and the NHL alone? If Olympic contributions do matter, shouldn't there be a bunch of Russians in the HHOF because of their contributions to hockey?
The reason I ask is I've never actually thought about it from that perspective, I've always thought it was based on ones play in the NHL.
I think Brodeur, Iginla and Jagr are all but guaranteed. The rest I feel are debatable, guys like Ovi and Crosby may have their careers totally come off the rails (highly unlikely) so I'll leave them off for now.
For the Rangers as of right now I can see Lundqvist, St. Louis, and Nash (everyone else it's too early in their careers imo). Lundqvist and St. Louis are self explanatory.
Nash, if he averages about 30 goals and 50 points for just the next 5 years that'll put him over 500 goals and about 50 points short of 1000 at 35 years old. Along with his Olympic record and if he wins a Cup, it's not out of the realm of possibility.
Ovechkin could retire next year and still have a very strong chance of making it...
Assuming he could score 25 goals, he'd have 500 goals, 3 harts, a calder, 5 richards, an art ross, 3 ted lindseys, 3 WC gold medals and been a first team all-star 6 times at the age of 30.
I doubt Nash gets in. Aside from one or two years in his career, he hasn't really been an elite player. Things look pretty bad for him when you look at his competition today, as well as some guys who aren't in the hall yet who should be.
I see people mentioning Olympic contributions. Does that or should it have any bearing on if a player makes the HHOF? Shouldn't it be based on what they did in the NHL and the NHL alone? If Olympic contributions do matter, shouldn't there be a bunch of Russians in the HHOF because of their contributions to hockey?
The reason I ask is I've never actually thought about it from that perspective, I've always thought it was based on ones play in the NHL.
I really don't see why Elias should make it. He's been a very good player. Not HHOF worthy, though.
That'd be watering down the honor quite a bit in my opinion.
Ovechkin could retire next year and still have a very strong chance of making it...
Assuming he could score 25 goals, he'd have 500 goals, 3 harts, a calder, 5 richards, an art ross, 3 ted lindseys, 3 WC gold medals and been a first team all-star 6 times at the age of 30.
Considering some players on the list I made won't retire in the next decade, the list looks big but that's a time span of like 1990-2030 for the pool of players so let's not pretend that it's crazy to put so many names.Hf just wants everyone in the hall, I swear.
I don't see Nash making it. Never was really part of the elite aside of one or two seasons. His stats in the playoffs and the olympics are underwhelming too. It's nice to win some Gold medals but if you're not a key contributor, it's not worth much.For the Rangers as of right now I can see Lundqvist, St. Louis, and Nash (everyone else it's too early in their careers imo). Lundqvist and St. Louis are self explanatory.
Nash, if he averages about 30 goals and 50 points for just the next 5 years that'll put him over 500 goals and about 50 points short of 1000 at 35 years old. Along with his Olympic record and if he wins a Cup, it's not out of the realm of possibility.
I've never seen Gainey play but if he's in the HHOF, I don't think it's that crazy to throw Bergeron's name in the mix.I'm on the side of making the HHOF harder to get in, to many very good players are already in there. Big no to guys like Nash or Bergeron who never near the best Forwards in the game, if you can't even make the all star teams a few times in your career you shouldn't even be considered, with exceptions to some years with stacked positions obviously.
I really don't see why Elias should make it. He's been a very good player. Not HHOF worthy, though.
That'd be watering down the honor quite a bit in my opinion.
Hall of very good: Patrick Marleau, Vincent Lecavalier, Ray Whitney, Sergei Gonchar, Patrick Elias, Marian Gaborik, Shane Doan, Dan Boyle, Jason Spezza, Dany Heatley, Eric Staal, Alex Tanguay, Roberto Luongo, Phil Kessel, Rick Nash, Kimmo Timonen, Andrei Markov, Evgeni Nabokov, Ryan Miller,
HHOF worthy: Sidney Crosby, Alex Ovechkin, Evgeni Malkin, Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane, Martin St. Louis, Jarome Iginla, Joe Thornton, Martin Brodeur, Jaromir Jagr, Marian Hossa, Pavel Datsyuk, Henrik Zetterberg, Zdeno Chara, Duncan Keith, Erik Karlsson, Patrice Bergeron.
Debatable: Tim Thomas, Henrik Lundqvist, Anze Kopitar, Nicklas Backstrom, Jonathan Quick, Henrik & Daniel Sedin, Corey Perry and Ryan Getzlaf (winning the Cup this year would help them tremendously), PK Subban, Drew Doughty, Shea Weber, Carey Price, Claude Giroux & John Tavares (will both need some top 3 finishes down the stretch to make a case for themselves).
Agree/disagree?
Good post, I'd change my stance after reading that. You make some fair and rational arguments.Elias wouldn't even be close to the worst player in the Hall. He's got over 1000 points, an excellent peak where he was without a doubt a top-3 player at his position, lead a decade in playoff scoring, won two Cups (as the leading scorer both times), and did so on a team where his offensive numbers were significantly deflated by both team and Dead Puck Era bias.
He compares favorably to Hossa and Alfredsson (he did as much as they did with much less help IMO), both of who will probably get in.
I've made a more extensive argument here comparing him to other notable players of the 2000's.